Answering The Hard Questions

THIS ARTICLE IS CURRENTLY BEING EXPANDED. PLEASE EXCUSE TYPOS OR INCOMPLETE INFORMATION.


When faced with massive industry corruption, people often find it hard to believe that such a thing could happen. When faced with massive government corruption, people find it even harder to believe.

Imagine how hard it is for people to believe when government and industry join forces.

When explaining geoengineering ("chemtrails") to people, it often raises many questions. These questions arise because their existing world view does allow for such things to occur. People say, "The government would never do this", or "If this were happening, I would know about", or "Why is this not all over the news?"

Well, this article is going to answer your questions, and in so doing, you will begin to understand the world in a way you never have before.

As of the writing of this article, our Global Skywatch Facebook Group has over 32,000 people, and many of those have personally thanked us for help them to "wake up".

"Waking up" can be an uncomfortable process because it changes you, it challenges you, and it makes you face your own weaknesses, but it's all worth it. No one who has become awake turns back and wishes for their former state of ignorance or weakness.

The more people who understand - the more people who are awake - the better chance we have to avoid the dangers that history has shown us abide with national ignorance. We hope this article helps you to see the big picture and to profoundly understand the world in which we all live.


About This Article

This article attempts to answer the hard questions about geoengineering, often referred to as "chemtrails".

If you have a question you would like to see answered here, please contact us.


Are Bifurcated Plumes Injected Aerosols?

This question was thoroughly covered in the article: The Lines In The Sky Are Not Contrails: Definitive Evidence.


What About Non Bifurcated Plumes? Are They Injected Aerosols?

Not all of these massive plumes we see in the sky are bifurcated (split). How can we know whether or not these plumes are contrails?

When analyzing non-bifurcated plumes, whether the plumes are long or short, all of the previously-covered points still apply, as do other important points of evidence:

(1) High-bypass turbofans don't emit enough water to create contrails or ice crystals.

A rare and obsolete exception to this rule is a water-injection turbofan engine. This engine is capable of producing short, non-persistent contrails under rare atmospheric conditions. An example of this engine is the Rolls Royce, Spey 512. This engine is in service on less than 50 BAC jets in the entire United Kingdom, most notably, the BAC (British Aircraft Corporation) "One-Eleven".

Even with 50 BAC jets in service, we must consider the following points to help us understand how seldom we will see this type of jet:

    (a) The total number of jets in the air at any given time is between 5,000 (at night) and 19,000 (during peak hours) in the United States alone.

    (b) Only a fraction of the 50 BAC One-Elevens are aloft at any given time.

    (c) Only a tiny fraction of these aloft One-Elevens will produce true contrails.

    (d) Those contrails will be very short and not visible from the ground.

(2) Conditions for engine-contrail formation are very rare.

This point only applies to jet engines because high-bypass turbofans don't emit sufficient water to produce plumes.

(3) Conditions for engine-contrail formation only occur at altitudes too high to be seen from the ground.

In order for contrails to form there must be enough water vapor present. High-bypass turbofans don't emit enough water vapor for the formation of plumes, regardless of temperature or humidity.

(4) Historical observations show that high-bypass jet plumes are virtually non-existent.

Plume suddenly started covering the skies literally overnight between 1995 and 2000, depending on location. These plumes did not increase gradually over time as disinformation websites try to infer.

According to the FAA, airline traffic increase only 0.9% each year, so the claims by disinformation websites that the increase in plumes is due to the increase in air traffic are fictitious.

(5) Surface water metal contamination tests (primarily aluminum and barium) show that water-metal levels correlate with observed plume events.

In other words, when plume are released, surface water shows dramatic increases in the stated metals (California water tests. Video coming soon.).

(6) Environmentally-sensitive people in numerous countries detect air contamination and suffer symptoms that correlate with observed plume events.

Symptoms correlate with those known to be caused by metals being found in surface water tests.

These points and others provide an overwhelming body of evidence that metals and other contaminants are being intentionally released during observed plume events.


Plumes Emitted At Airports

A Boeing 747 has a wingspan of 196 feet. The plumes emitted from 747's (and other types of jets) spread out to many-times the width of their wingspan within seconds. This means these plumes become wider than a city block, which is between 660 and 900 feet. This is also wider than several football fields. These plumes often remain clearly visible after several minutes or hours. This indicates the particulates are dense enough to reflect a significant portion of light even after some time has elapsed. If we were able to stand in one of these plumes, we would be acutely aware that we are standing in a significantly dense fog, even a blinding fog if it was recently released.


Note the dramatic size difference between a new plume and one that is a few minutes old. The older plume has descended somewhat. Photo Credit: Linda Frazier, 4/1/2015

According to the World Watch Institute:

"Planes use the most fuel, and produce the most harmful emissions, during takeoff. On short flights, as much as 25 percent of the total fuel consumed is used at this time."(1)

If jets use so more much fuel at takeoff, why don't we see enormous, blinding plumes at airports? If so much water is being released from these engines, why aren't airport runways and buildings sopping wet?

In reality, when jets take off, they release black carbon soot, but little water. This soot emission is clearly visible at any modern airport.


What About Short Plumes That Dissipate Quickly?

We have witnessed a dramatic and sudden change in many locations since 2010. Long plumes are changing to short plumes overnight. In these cases, long plumes only occur about 5 to 10 days per month, but the rest of the month, the plumes are short, non-persistent, and are being released at much higher altitudes.


Short, non-persistent plumes are injected aerosols too.

Obviously, atmospheric conditions have not suddenly changed preventing "contrail" formation most of the month. Contrail formation was already impossible for high-bypass turbofans.

We believe plumes have been changed from long to short to keep the spraying program out of the minds of the public. Of course, they cannot completely eliminate the plumes because this would cause the public to question the new wave of propaganda teaching school children and the public that "contrails are normal". For this reason, they must continue emitting visible plumes at least a few days per month to maintain the former disinformation.


Are chemtrails condensation like exhaled breath or car exhaust on a cold day?

One of the most common claims made by public disinformants is that "trails behind jets are harmless water vapor". These paid disinformants compare the exhaust of cars and the exhaled human breath to the exhaust of high-bypass turbofan engines. We will explain why there is no academically honest way to compare these different forms of "combusted" air in the context of proposed condensation trails.

While it is true that car exhaust, human breath, and high-bypass turbofan engines all contain some water vapor, the factor that makes car exhaust and human breath so different than a high-bypass turbine engine is the ratio of air-to-water emitted.

First, lets explain this in simple terms.

When you start your car on a cold day, water vapor, which is one of the products of fuel combustion, is emitted by the exhaust and is clearly visible because of the ratio of water to air is very high. In other words, there is a lot of water in comparison to the total amount of air.

Human breath is the same. There is a high amount of moisture in human breath as a ratio to the total amount of air.

High-bypass turbofans are different because their job is to move as much air as possible with as little fuel as possible. 85% of the air that passes through a HB turbofan is uncombusted, ambient (outside) air, so the ratio combusted air to the total air emitted by the engine is extremely small.

Let's consider this illustration.

If you place a piece of glass next to your car's muffler, there is a chance that the glass will become foggy if the glass is cold enough. We all know there is enough moisture in our breath to fog up a piece of glass. However, if you place a piece of glass near the output of a HB turbofan engine, nothing will happen because there is simply too little water for the amount of air.

This demonstration can be seen at any airport on a very cold day. If the outside air is cold enough, your car may produce fog, and your breath may also produce fog, but watch the jets taking off. There is no fog and no condensation formed because the water-to-air ratio is much too low. Whether a jet is taking off in below-freezing temperatures or flying at 35,000 feet in below-freezing temperatures, you will not see fog or condensation emitted from the engines.

To drive this point even further, consider this.

During takeoff, HB turbofans are very inefficient. They use much more fuel in ratio to the amount of air moved. Consequently, they have a much higher water-to-air ratio at takeoff than at any other time in their entire flight. So if HB turbofans were going to produce trails, the most likely time (by far) trails would occur is during takeoff, but the simply do not.

Let's drive this point home even further.

Cars are less capable of producing condensed exhaust than many believe, however, when cars are first started, the muffler is full of ice from water that condensed and froze in the muffler and the catalytic converter the previous time the car was used. This ice quickly melts and turns into steam from the engine heat. Once the water trapped in the muffler boils off, the amount of steam produced by the engine will noticeably decrease.

Furthermore, cold engines are less efficient and burn more fuel to air.

Finally, emissions equipment installed in cars is largely inactive until the car reaches operating temperature. This also increases the emitted fog on a cold day.

So, when judging how much fog a car can actually produce in cold weather, wait until it fully warmed up and then check. You'll notice it's less than you initially observed.


windshield test



Gasoline Combustion

Following is the theoretical chemical formula for gasoline combustion under ideal conditions:

2 C8H18 + 25 O2 → 16 CO2 + 18 H2O

Assuming ideal conditions, 2 hydrocarbons (2 C8H18) and 25 oxygen atoms (24 O2) combine to form 16 carbon dioxide molecules (16 CO2) and 18 water molecules (18 H2O). Under ideal conditions, your engine would emit carbon dioxide and water exclusively, however, it is well known that car combustion is far from ideal.

Our atmosphere contains 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 1% argon, 0.04% carbon dioxide, water vapor, and other gases such as neon, helium, krypton, and xenon. All of these elements combine to produce much-less-than-ideal conditions for the conversion of gasoline to carbon dioxide and water. This is why cars also emit numerous other contaminants including carbon monoxide (CO), uncombusted hydrocarbons (C8H18), nitrogen oxide (NO2), ozone (O3), carbon soot, and much more.

Needless to say, a significant portion of gas is not converted to carbon dioxide and water. Nevertheless, enough is converted so you can witness condensation coming out of your exhaust pipe on cold days.

When gasoline is combusted, it converts to carbon dioxide and water, but this combustion is far from perfect or complete.


Exhaled Breath


High-Bypass Turbofan Engines





Air near the sea may contain salts. Air in cities or industrialized areas contains more carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, metal particulates, chemicals, and numerous other contaminants. All these gasses, metals, and chemicals affect a typical car making the combustion process far from ideal. As a result, a car will emit a wider range of materials including carbon monoxide (CO), uncombusted hydrocarbons (C8H18), nitrogen oxide (NO2), and more.




What disinformants don't tell you is that neither of the 2 conditions above are perfect:

(1) The atmosphere contains several major components including



A gasoline (petrol) molecule is made up as such:

C8H18 (or 8 Carbon atoms and 18 Hydrogen atoms)

Energy is obtained from the combustion of it by the conversion of a hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and water. The combustion of octane follows this reaction:

2 C8H18 + 25 O2 → 16 CO2 + 18 H2O

Or better said, you have two of the hydrocarbon atoms along with 25 oxygen atoms, they swirl together into a mix, the spark plug ignites them, boom, and out the tail pipe comes 16 carbon dioxide molecules and 18 water molecules ... at least in a perfect world. Some cars don't put out exactly that ratio. There may be a little bit of carbon monoxide (CO), unburnt hydrocarbons (C8H18), and/or nitrogen oxide (NO2) coming out of the engine exhaust port along with the CO2 and H2O. In this case, the catalytic convertor's job is to help clean these up so you can get closer to the perfect ratio described above.

As described, the water coming out of the tail pipe i


What About Contrails Behind Wings?

There is one type of contrail that can be seen under certain, special conditions. This has been coined a "Vacuum-Zone" contrail.

In high school, we did an experiment in science class. The teacher would take a vacuum chamber and remove the air with a vacuum pump.


A vacuum chamber similar to the one used in high-school experiments.

As the vacuum increased (the air density decreased), a visible mist would form inside the chamber. The air was no longer able to dissipate the moisture it contained and the moisture condenses together into larger particles and consequently becomes visible. Then, the science teacher would suddenly open a valve allowing air to rush back into the container. The visible mist immediately disappeared as the air we once again able to dissipate the water.

This is exactly what is happening above the wings of jets when they are creating an especially high vacuum. High vacuum can occur with a heavily-loaded jet during takeoff. It can also occur during landing when pulling the nose up just before touchdown. This phenomenon can also occur above the outer wings of jet fighters that suddenly pull up hard. This creates an extreme vacuum above the wing causing the water in the air to momentarily condense and create a true contrail.


Photo Credit: Tanker Enemy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeL2wBhBBpc



In cases where there is no transparent center in the plumes, the aerosols are likely being added to jet fuel (see video below) or injected directly into the combusted exhaust air flow. There are patents supporting this technology going back over 30 years.


Where are all the whistleblowers?

Whistleblowers have come out and exposed the enormous spraying campaign, but you won't hear about it on the nightly news.

There have been only a limited number of whistleblowers because they have been severely threatened. It's vital to understand that spraying is very harmful and affects everyone, so if the public ever became aware on a large scale, the consequences for those spraying would devastating (to them). For this reason, they have used every method possible to keep people from knowing about - or believing - that the spraying campaign is happening.

In short, historic crimes against humanity deserve historic disinformation campaigns.

We are currently expanding a portion of our site dedicated to whistleblowers. We'll provide a link to that section as soon as it is complete. In the mean time, here are a few links:

- Ex-Military Whistleblower Exposes Powdered Metals Imported to Air Force Bases

- Whistle Blower: "I Installed Chemtrail Devices" Says Aerospace Worker

- An Honest Pilot Who Believes in Chemtrails: "A Necessary Evil"

- A Chemtrail Pilot Speaks


Why aren't state air monitoring agencies discovering metal contaminants in the air?

Descending particulates are not detected by city and state air-monitoring devices because they are simply too small for the type of detection equipment used.

This is why HEPA filters are unable to remove these particles from the air.


Can We Protect Ourselves With HEPA Filters?

The technology that disperses aerosols in this way has been patented. These patents state that this procedure is entirely safe for the engine when very small particles are used.

Observations on the ground show that these particulates are so small, they cannot be captured by HEPA filters, therefore they are smaller than 0.3 microns. This also explains why these descending particulates are not detected by city air-monitoring devices; they are simply too small for the type of detection equipment used.

Modern consumer-level air purification technology is unable to remove these small particles from the air.


Wikipedia And Other Websites Say Jets Produce A Lot Of Water Vapor

You may see complex formulas online that claim that jet fuel is converted into water vapor when it's burned.

These formulas are intentionally deceptive. They falsely assume a very high-oxygen atmosphere and nearly complete combustion, neither is which is true in the real world.

Wikipedia is known to be a friend and supporter of large industry, such as the pharmaceutical industry, the petroleum industry, and others. This strange relationship has assisted in the appearance of "industry-friendly" disinformation on Wikipedia.

These powerful industries have purchased government support and homogenized by forming disinformation contractors. These are companies who hire people to sit behind desks and create websites and social media accounts (like Facebook) for the purpose of spreading disinformation.

Governments and industry are extremely-well coordinated for reasons explained below.

Do not be deceived by these taxpayer-funded disinformants.



Don't Jet Engines Form Ice Crystal Contrails?

Another claim disinformants make is that contrails are ice crystals formed when water is emitted by a turbofan engine into a sufficiently-cold atmosphere. There are three fundamental problems with this argument:

First, the vast majority of plumes witnessed between 2000 and 2010 were emitted at altitudes much too low and too warm for ice crystal formation. In fact, during this time, the all of the plumes we saw were emitted at altitudes so low, you could clearly count the engines on the jet and even see winglets on the jets that had them.

Second, high-bypass turbofan engines simply don't emit enough water to form any visible amount of vapor or ice crystals.

Third, the conditions for contrail formation can only exist at high altitudes, and as stated earlier, the vast majority of plume sightings between 2000 and 2010 occurred at low altitudes. furthermore, conditions for contrails formation require -70 degrees and 70% humidity (as stated by NASA), a condition which rarely exists outside clouds.


Don't Studies Exist Saying Contrails Are Real?

Another claim disinformants make is that contrails are ice crystals formed when water is emitted by a turbofan engine.

Disinformants fail to mention that this only applies to jet engines which are used on fighter jets, and rare water-injection jets. They infer the claim of contrail to high-bypass turbofan engines and rely on the ignorance of the public.

It's becoming well-know that we live in a time when fake/falsified science is being used to deceive the public. Governments who use fake science to support their policies (which invariably support industry) are called "Science Dictatorships".


Why does the news keep claiming that these are harmless contrails?

This question opens a huge can of worms, but it must be dealt with.

In short, news today is completely corporate/industry owned as are all global governments. If this seems like a hard item to swallow, you're not alone, but if you endure and take the time to follow the links below, you will begin to see just how these facts have come to be.

First, mainstream media is completely corporate owned:

- These 6 Corporations Control 90% Of The Media In America

Second, all governments are completely banker/corporate owned:

- All Wars Are Banker's Wars

- What is ALEC? Making Laws and Making Deals in Hidden Rooms

- Iraq for Sale

- The Corporation Nation

- Introduction To Global Conspiracies

- Pivotal quotes from Zbigniew Brzezinski's book "Between Two Ages


Who is doing the spraying?

The spraying is taking place in most countries around the world. Because this activity requires special access to airspace over any given country, it's clear that each government is well aware of this activity.

The spraying campaign is the largest coordinated aerial program in human history, and the fact that all governments are doing it in unison is a testament to the assertion that all countries in the world are controlled - or at least deeply influenced - by the same people.

The cold war is a good example. During this time, the U.S. and Russia performed space missions together and cooperated in many ways, but the public was constantly coerced by mainstream news to believe that we were in a "cold war". This cold war fueled profits for military contractors, who work very closely with governments. In fact, it's the same cast of characters over and over.

Once you realize the depth and scope of control bankers/industrialists have on all governments of the world, global politics will begin to make sense in a way you never thought possible.

Links in the question above will help answer this this question as well. More links will be provide here in time.


Related Links

High-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails. So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?

How Persistent Aerosol Plumes are Being Changed to Short Non-Persistent Plumes To Fool the Public

Who Is Ken Caldeira

Contrails DO NOT EXIST According To Older Aviation Textbooks

Global Skywatch Exposes the Contrail Myth

NASA Cloud Chart for Schoolchildren

Chemtrails in Animated Movies: "Over the Hedge"

Council on Foreign Relations Admits Millions Spent on Disinformation

Disinfomation from a Textbook

Chemtrails in Animated Movies: "Cars"

CFR Meeting Says Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering

Disinformation At An All-Time High

The Methods Used To Keep You In The Dark

COINTELPRO: An Acronym for FBI Counterintelligence Programs

Council on Foreign Relations: "Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering"

Textbook Disinformation: "Weather Studies"

New NASA Disinformation:
Cloud Chart for Schoolchildren

US Gov. Software Creates 'Fake People' on Social Networks to Promote Propoganda