False Study: "Experimental Test of the Influence of Propulsion Efficiency on Contrail Formation"See Also:
Lying Academics: Science Dictatorships: Controlling Populations with False StudiesWe recently received an email inquiring about a study from the Journal of Aircraft entitled "Experimental Test of the Influence of Propulsion Efficiency on Contrail Formation" (attached below). In this "study", the authors claim that new high-efficiency turbofan engines produce condensation trails.
Because of the enormous amount of disinformation being thrust upon the public today, we decided to publish our response to help people understand and respond to falsified studies and professional disinformation.
Please feel free to send a link to this article to anyone who is confused about contrail formation and the actual pervasive nature of disinformation today.The Journal of Aircraft published a study entitled "
Experimental Test of the Influence of Propulsion Efficiency on Contrail Formation" which claims that new, high-efficiency turbofan engines are more likely to produce contrails than older, low-efficiency engines.
This claim, besides being patently false, is an example of the onslaught of disinformation being thrust upon the public today.
This study claims to have been performed in 1999 and published in 2000. It is typical of disinformation we see in several industries including the
pharmaceutical and
petroleum industries. These industries routinely publish falsified studies and blatant disinformation to make their products and policies more palatable to the public.
In hundreds of cases, thousands of pages of fake studies have been published in professional journals touting research that was never done by doctors who don't even exist. Other studies were completely fabricated while real doctors were paid (bribed) to have their names falsely placed as the authors of the fictional studies. Unfortunately, This is
how the world works today and is a fact that the public has become much more aware of. The art of controlling a population using false science is often referred to as "
Scientism".
This falsified "contrail" study happened to be published in 2000; the same year numerous governments dramatically increased their chemical-aerosol spraying programs. The propagandists expect you to believe the timing is just a wild coincidence. High-bypass turbofans have been flying for decades, yet the year the spraying program mushroomed just happens to be the year controlled-academia decides to publish a "study" on them, a study which attempts to legitimize them. The study makes blatantly false claims expecting experienced professional pilots and lifelong skywatchers, and even military personnel to believe that skies have been saturated with "contrails" since the engines were invented.Despite the fact that turbofan efficiency has been steadily improved since their initial design, this study came out at the same time the public was beginning to show great concern about widespread aerosol lines that suddenly began saturating their skies day after day. This study appeared just in time to quell public concern about the massive and
sudden changes witnessed over our heads. In fact, a lot of
disinformation came out during this time which opposed the emerging truth that spraying was occurring. This disinformation attempted to convince the public that contrails are common despite the fact that it is virtually impossible for high-bypass turbofans to produce contrails at all.
Like so much disinformation today, it appears credible at first glance but contains concepts that are completely contrary to current widely-accepted paradigms.
For example, we know that small portions of water occur in turbofan exhaust from the combustion of jet fuel, yet more efficient engines use less fuel and therefore have less water in their exhaust. The more efficient an engine is, the less fuel it burns in ratio to the amount of air it ejects making the engine less capable of producing condensation trails, the exact opposite conclusion drawn from the study, yet, the very conclusion that aerosol-geoengineers want the public to believe.
Furthermore, helicopters use the same engine type as all turbofans: jet turbines. The jet turbine engine is the "power plant" for all turbofan engines. When you hear a helicopter starting, the sound is very similar to that of a jet because the powerplant is the same. Notice that you do not see helicopters spewing massive plumes of condensation. In fact, you don't see any condensation at all, only a faint, dark soot. This is the same dark soot you see emitted from turbofan engines at the airport. This dark soot is the carbon byproduct of jet fuel (kerosene) combustion, and this is exactly what you would expect to see, not massive amounts of water as claimed by government disinformation contractors. Disinformationalists claim that helicopters fly too low to produce contrails, yet virtually all early plume sightings from jets occurred in very low airspace, that same airspace you see helicopters flying. These very low-flying aerosol-emitting jets were spotted for years before they began
flying at much higher altitudes.
Even more astonishing is the fact that citizen investigators have discovered that many of the massive plumes emitted from high-bypass turbofans are being emitted from the bypass air stream only, not the turbine exhaust. In fact, telescopic photography and video shows that the central stream of air—the combusted air that powers the turbine—is clear and contains no plume. Contrail disinformationalists claim that contrails are formed from water vapor released from the burning of kerosene fuel. If this is true, then the only area we should see plume emissions is from the the turbine exhaust which is the central core of the engine, not the bypass air stream. (Read more about this here:
The Lines In The Sky Are Not Contrails: Definitive Evidence.)
This fact alone has profound and definitive implications. The bypass air is not combusted. It is simply blown through the outer shroud of the engine and out through the back. So we have to ask ourselves: How can uncombusted air form condensation? Simply put, it can't. The only reasonable explanation is that chemical aerosols are being injected into the bypass air stream within the engine.
Fabricators of false studies know that 99% of people won't read the studies, and even if they did, they would not understand them. They make these studies appear too complex for the non-scientist. They fill the studies with complex formulas and scientific-sounding information which makes them more believable to the public and further adds to the facade of their credibility.
False studies like this one are designed to cause the public to dismiss the metallic aerosols being sighted in the skies day after day despite laboratory evidence on the ground, such as
rainwater and snow tests which show dangerous levels of aluminum and other metals which are known to be sprayed by direct testimony of
military whistleblowers.
The real problem we have today is a fearful population. Certainly, no one wants to believe that governments—controlled by international industrialists—would spray the public with known poisons. That is a
scary thought. So all governments have to do is provide a "believable" argument in the name of science ("plausible deniability") and the public—fearful of being rejected by friends and family—will grasp onto the disinformation while denying all common sense. They run from the fear that would ensue if such a scary truth were to be accepted. In plain language, fearful people follow and hold on to comfortable disinformation for dear life, and well-educated academics are often among the most fearful and socially-pressured.
Those who think for themselves and use common sense are shockingly rare these days, but are rapidly growing in number due to the onslaught of information proving that chemical spraying is in fact occurring right now.
It has been said:
The truth is first rejected,
then it is violently opposed,
then it is accepted as self-evident.You can count on the fact that those who fearfully reject the truth now will be the first to claim it to be self-evident as soon as it becomes socially acceptable.
We encourage concerned citizens and parents not to waste time educating those who reject public evidence or who desperately grasp on to disinformation. Instead, move on and educate those who are capable of critical self-thought, those who have the courage to come to their own conclusions without succumbing to social pressure.
The world needs more leaders and less followers; more faith and less fear.
Remember, just as some of what you see in
mainstream media is fabricated, you have no way of knowing whether studies published in journals ever took place. In many cases they are complete fiction;
sophisticated propaganda designed to sway public opinion for the benefit of
large corporations controlled by
powerful industrialists.
Here's
what you can do to get involved.
Related LinksLying Academics: Science Dictatorships: Controlling Populations with False StudiesHigh-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails. So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?How Persistent Aerosol Plumes are Being Changed to Short Non-Persistent Plumes To Fool the Public
Where Did The Term "Conspiracy Theorists" Come From?Veteran Offers $10,000 To Prove Contrail MythWho Is Ken CaldeiraContrails DO NOT EXIST According To Older Aviation TextbooksGlobal Skywatch Exposes the Contrail MythNASA Cloud Chart for SchoolchildrenChemtrails in Animated Movies: "Over the Hedge"Council on Foreign Relations Admits Millions Spent on DisinformationDisinfomation from a TextbookChemtrails in Animated Movies: "Cars"CFR Meeting Says Millions Spent to Confuse Public About GeoengineeringDisinformation At An All-Time HighThe Methods Used To Keep You In The DarkCOINTELPRO: An Acronym for FBI Counterintelligence ProgramsCouncil on Foreign Relations: "Millions Spent to Confuse Public About Geoengineering"Textbook Disinformation: "Weather Studies"New NASA Disinformation:
Cloud Chart for SchoolchildrenUS Gov. Software Creates 'Fake People' on Social Networks to Promote Propoganda
