The video referred to in the post just above is insofar interesting as Kerry Bentivolio is a political newcomer in Washington, D.C. and as a political newcomer he does not know yet the political sensibilities in Washington, D.C. His focus is surely on the U.S. government structure itself and the spending connected with it.
But in this context this does not matter as he gets confronted in that meeting filmed above by a citizen who has among other topics the topic of chemtrails in his mind.
And now the point-making situation: Kerry is a political newcomer, who gets confronted with a topic which is being bashed in the political public as we can see it in the documentary by Michael Murphy. Nobody really wanted to touch this topic on the lobbying floor in U.S. Congress. Chemtrail is a political off-topic - untouchable. That is the way political correctness works: it is taboo where you can burn only your fingers.
That is the reason why it was so difficult to make a political conference within the European Parliament. And as the topic was touched in the interview with Daniel Cohn-Bendit it was seen that he did not like it at all. (
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=6958#Post6958 ) This is surely the reason why Daniel Cohn-Bendit in Europe broke with the politics of the French Green Party as he publicly stated. He did not broke with the Green Party as a whole.
Beyond political attitudes (right/left, green, economics, Democrats/Republicans et al.) and political opinions there is obviously an overall nonverbal functioning on the public theatre.
It is a public taboo.
How can that be if the political system is structured in a way that free speech is the basis for the development of political opinion which again is the basis for the structuring of the legal process?
Within the video at
Minutes: 10 Seconds: 51 and
Minutes: 11 Seconds: 5
Kerry Bentivolio gets obviously twice a psychosomatic flush while dealing with the topic of chemtrails. This topic obviously causes distress to Kerry Bentivolio although his own political attitude is critical to administrative action as a whole.
It will be interesting how Kerry Bentivolio as a new part of the political class will be dealing with that topic.
If it is a topic of "National Security" it surely will be restricted to him. On the other side the obvious sightings in the sky show everybody that something is going on. And because of that the political function of "Political Correctness" is that important: It is nothing else but Censorship - only through the way of Self-Censorship and putting the responsibility of this kind of censorship to the individual himself or herself who is lonesome with his or her impression. "National Security" disguises this specific topic as it must be obviously extremely important as people died over it.
The problem with that: nobody can control the opinion about the spraying programs of the specialist within the government administration with a secondary opinion. There is no real discussion about specific methods being in action because the controlling persons at the legislative level and at the judicial level (secret court) don't have an expert opinion on the specific topic they are dealing with. They have to TRUST. But trust is not knowledge. This might be very dangerous - not only to the public but also to THEMSELVES. This contradiction in conduct is even bigger because the cause of the declaration for a topic of being a topic of "National Security" is the public welfare. In a public discussion the probability is bigger that opposing opinions might better the political result. That is not possible to a topic of "National Security". And if a topic like chemtrails is being so obviously one may ask what is the establishment of "National Security" afraid of to discuss it publicly?
Let's hope that Kerry Bentivolio will be successful with his investigation of the topic of chemtrails. Let's keep him free from psychosomatic flushs as soon as he touches this topic.
