http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_Bentivolio


"Congressman Promises to Hold Chemtrail Hearing
Posted by cln September 10, 2013 in Chemtrails-Geoengineering, Environment with 0 Comments

Melissa Melton | Activist Post | Sept 11 2013

Representative Kerry Bentivolio (R-MI) has recently promised to hold a hearing to investigate whether or not there is a secret program to spray a chemical soup of heavy metals and other toxins — better known as ‘chemtrails’ — into the skies above America without disclosure to the American people.

While an airplane contrail fades and disappears behind the plane after just a few minutes, chemtrails do not disappear like the typical vapor trails do. Instead, chemtrails, typically found to contain heavy metals such as barium and aluminum, spread out and hang in the air for hours before settling as a murky haze on the horizon. Many people have attributed illnesses, including everything from asthma to Morgellonsdisease, to the chemtrail phenomenon.

While fellow Republicans have dubbed Rep. Bentivolio ‘Krazy Kerry’ for telling his constituents he will call meetings such as this one, Bentivolio made the promise at an Aug. 21 town hall:

“We’ll bring in some Air Force folks right here in our district. We can have an oversight reform committee hearing right here and we’ll investigate,” said Bentivolio in response to an audience question. “I’d like to find out about it too.”

According to the online publication Deadline Detroit, “Chemtrails, like FEMA is building concentration camps, vaccines cause autism, juice boxes make you gay, and 9/11 was a government plot, is one of those paranoid claims that can be believed only if you’re an idiot”. Deadline Detroit writer Jeff Wattrick expounds on his astute observations:

The chemtrail theory, for those of you who don’t speak crazy, asserts that some nefarious force (the government, the Trilaterial Commission, the Bildeberger Group, the communists, the bankers, corporate interests, or possibly all of them together) have spiked jet plane contrails — airplane exhaust, in lay terms — with chemicals designed to do, well, something. And it’s bad. Scientists have thoroughly and repeatedly debunked this theory, but it persists because maybe all the scientists are part of the conspiracy. Of course, they are.

Opinions aside, scientists all across the globe have openly and repeatedly called for aerosols to be sprayed in the air under the guise of geoengineering — a supposed plan to save the Earth from anthropogenic global warming.

According to Reuters, “Geo-engineering options include adding sun-reflecting chemicals to the upper atmosphere to mimic the effect of big volcanic eruptions that mask the sun.” A study published in the journal Environmental Research Letters last year found, “The development of new, specialized aircraft appeared to be the cheapest option” to deliver a million tonnes of sunlight-dimming sulfates into the upper atmosphere for roughly $5 billion a year. Billionaire Bill Gates is even financially backing his own geoengineering initiatives and lobbying for wide-scale geoengineering projects.

Further, a 2008 KSLA news investigation revealed heavy metals detected in high altitude chemtrails included lead, barium and arsenic among other potentially toxic substances; KSLA found test samples included more than six times the toxic level of Barium than what has been set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

In other words, the idea of using planes to spray heavy metals and chemicals into the air to manipulate the weather is not fiction or a conspiracy theory. In fact, the U.S. government has been working on weather manipulation with cloud seeding since at least the early ’60s with Project Stormfury. More recently, the Central Intelligence Agency signed to the tune of $630,000 for a geoengineering study that would include, “solar radiation management — a fancy term for pumping particles into the stratosphere to reflect incoming sunlight away from the planet.”

It looks like ‘Krazy Kerry’ isn’t so crazy after all.


To say geoengineering is a conspiracy theory is just silly at this point considering the overwhelming evidence this is already going on over our heads as we speak. None of us are being told where and when it is happening, nor are the full health risks of tinkering with our environment and the air we breathe being divulged to us even though we have every right to know.

Melissa Melton is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator ofTruthstream Media. Wake the flock up!

This post appeared at Activistpost"
http://consciouslifenews.com/congressman-promises-hold-chemtrail-hearing/1164954/

From
Minutes: 10 Seconds: 5 till Minutes: 16 Seconds: 40

[video:youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fun76Bi_QnM#t=606[/video]

The video referred to in the post just above is insofar interesting as Kerry Bentivolio is a political newcomer in Washington, D.C. and as a political newcomer he does not know yet the political sensibilities in Washington, D.C. His focus is surely on the U.S. government structure itself and the spending connected with it.

But in this context this does not matter as he gets confronted in that meeting filmed above by a citizen who has among other topics the topic of chemtrails in his mind.

And now the point-making situation: Kerry is a political newcomer, who gets confronted with a topic which is being bashed in the political public as we can see it in the documentary by Michael Murphy. Nobody really wanted to touch this topic on the lobbying floor in U.S. Congress. Chemtrail is a political off-topic - untouchable. That is the way political correctness works: it is taboo where you can burn only your fingers.

That is the reason why it was so difficult to make a political conference within the European Parliament. And as the topic was touched in the interview with Daniel Cohn-Bendit it was seen that he did not like it at all. ( http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=6958#Post6958 ) This is surely the reason why Daniel Cohn-Bendit in Europe broke with the politics of the French Green Party as he publicly stated. He did not broke with the Green Party as a whole.

Beyond political attitudes (right/left, green, economics, Democrats/Republicans et al.) and political opinions there is obviously an overall nonverbal functioning on the public theatre.

It is a public taboo.

How can that be if the political system is structured in a way that free speech is the basis for the development of political opinion which again is the basis for the structuring of the legal process?


Within the video at

Minutes: 10 Seconds: 51 and

Minutes: 11 Seconds: 5

Kerry Bentivolio gets obviously twice a psychosomatic flush while dealing with the topic of chemtrails. This topic obviously causes distress to Kerry Bentivolio although his own political attitude is critical to administrative action as a whole.

It will be interesting how Kerry Bentivolio as a new part of the political class will be dealing with that topic.

If it is a topic of "National Security" it surely will be restricted to him. On the other side the obvious sightings in the sky show everybody that something is going on. And because of that the political function of "Political Correctness" is that important: It is nothing else but Censorship - only through the way of Self-Censorship and putting the responsibility of this kind of censorship to the individual himself or herself who is lonesome with his or her impression. "National Security" disguises this specific topic as it must be obviously extremely important as people died over it.

The problem with that: nobody can control the opinion about the spraying programs of the specialist within the government administration with a secondary opinion. There is no real discussion about specific methods being in action because the controlling persons at the legislative level and at the judicial level (secret court) don't have an expert opinion on the specific topic they are dealing with. They have to TRUST. But trust is not knowledge. This might be very dangerous - not only to the public but also to THEMSELVES. This contradiction in conduct is even bigger because the cause of the declaration for a topic of being a topic of "National Security" is the public welfare. In a public discussion the probability is bigger that opposing opinions might better the political result. That is not possible to a topic of "National Security". And if a topic like chemtrails is being so obviously one may ask what is the establishment of "National Security" afraid of to discuss it publicly?

Let's hope that Kerry Bentivolio will be successful with his investigation of the topic of chemtrails. Let's keep him free from psychosomatic flushs as soon as he touches this topic.

"Rapid Technological Change(s) (Road/Air
Rage, Psychosomatic Illnesses, Withdrawal)"
http://fedgeno.com/documents/future-strategic-issues-and-warfare.pdf Page 30