"Environment Canada meteorologist rejects
As a meteorologist with Environment Canada, David Jones has dealt with many inquiries from the public about condensation trails.
“It’s a waste of energy to pursue these things,” Jones told the Straight by phone.
The Vancouver-based weather expert said there’s nothing there but water vapour. “It’s really just plain stupid to think that you could alter the climate by, you know, somehow using aircraft to drop tiny droplets or particles in the massive volume that the atmosphere is,” Jones said. “I mean, it’s just ridiculous.”
It would be very easy to believe David Jones if he could prove for each in question coming chemtrail that the humidity in the specific area of the observed chemtrail is very high. This is a very simple method and task for a meteorologist as seen above in the two videos ("New Facts"). For British Columbia, I am sure, there exists also meteorological data in these altitudes - alone because pilots need as much information as possible about the incoming weather for their future flights. For David Jones it must be an easy task as a professional in his field to deliver.
Thomas Schlatter, NOAA, explained this in 2003 in Weatherwise.org:
"Natural cirrus clouds form high in the troposphere, usually at temperatures below -40 degrees F, when there are sufficient ice nuclei (tiny particles that ice crystals can grow on) in the air and when the water vapor content is high enough. Upward motion in the high troposphere causes the cooling that brings air to saturation and forms the ice crystals in natural cirrus clouds. Contrails (an abbreviation of condensation trails) form when jet aircraft inject water vapor into the high troposphere or lower stratosphere, thereby bringing the air to saturation."
http://web.archive.org/web/20010309094441/http://www.weatherwise.org/qr/qry.chemtrail.html
So why doesn't David Jones act scientifically instead of making concerns of conscious citizen "ridiculous". "Ridiculousity" maybe an adequate reaction toward his colleagues when they make obvious professional mistakes. But towards people out of the common populace? Those who pay his job? And he decides that this a "waste of time" when he discusses this topic with "Non-Professionals"? That is only arrogance. This is not didactic at all. And when he is not explaining this subject he does not have to wonder that more and more people "believe" in chemtrails. They don't get a chance by David Jones to learn otherwise. This conduct of David Jones is not very consistent towards this topic. On the one side he proclaims that Contrail-Nonbelievers are "ridiculous" on the other side he is not willing to come down to the ground to educate people why they would be "ridiculous" to keep their beliefs.
He defrauds HAARP or other possible electromagnetic influence on the dispersed trails for the creation of ice nucleids (ionizing) that the suspected climate changing method has at least two parts when he writes:
"It’s really just plain stupid to think that you could alter the climate by, you know, somehow using aircraft to drop tiny droplets or particles in the massive volume that the atmosphere is, (...)"
This is only one of the necessary parts to get influence on the weather with today's methods.
These suspicions by concerned citizens would be dissolved into nothing if the temperature and humidity would not be right for the development of clouds in the targeted air space. It's just that simple.
And as a meteorologist he can not demonstrate this to the populace?
Unfortunately, there is nothing concrete from David Jones to handle with - except his argument of "ridiculousity". In the real sense of the word: whitewash. And no science at all.
