Instruments Showing 30% More UVB Than UVA: Geoengineering Is Destroying the Ozone Layer

After we purchased a total irradiance, whole spectrum light meter we have been seeing around 1,300 W/m2 as have others around the US using this same meter.
By the way, this whole spectrum meter was designed for solar contractors to assess the wattage needed in the PV panel array being specified for installations.

It is interesting that we see around the same amount of solar power on the ground as the "Solar Constant" in space. That figure, 1,360 W/m2 is an averaged number that is pretty obviously useless in ground based solar research, and a source for much confusion for those unable to think outside the pre-programmed box that the "Authorities" such as Koch Industries, DuPont Chemical or other government agencies under them dictate as reality...

But regardless, we and others are seeing around 1,300 W/m2 of raw solar power on the ground. At the same time we are seeing around 1/10 of that total power in the UV spectrum.

Here is where it gets scary:
Total irradiance: 1,304 W/m2
Total UV: 134.5 Wm2
UVA: 55.6 W/m2
UVB: 78.9 W/m2

That's right, our instruments are showing that we are seeing 30% MORE UVB than UVA!!!

This ratio keeps climbing as it has through the nearly 100 days of data logging we have performed.

Do the math.

Followup Comments

We are taking “direct beam” measurements, not averaged across half the planet facing the sun, so of course our numbers are higher.

Many people including disinfo agents that believe the numbers we post are outrageously high are not taking this into account.

We never said that the total UVA/UVB numbers were out of range, what we see that IS out of the norm is the ratio of UVB in the total UV spectrum.

Most sources state that we should see 1%-5% of total UV spectrum as UVB. We are seeing more than 1%-5%.

This would point to ozone degradation as a possible cause for the higher amounts of UVB than expected.

---

That number, 14 mW/cm2 is the averaged total UV in space, or approximately 1/10 of the whole solar irradiance “constant” of 1360 W/m2.

These numbers are averaged across the hemisphere of our planet facing the sun, not the direct beam measurements we are taking with our meters.

---

It is also interesting to note that on August 29, 2013 our Maine USA observer saw 3.32mW/cm2 (33.2W/m2) on a day that the observer noted “as completely cloudy/no sun”

On sunny days he is seeing between 11.78mW/cm2 to 13.99mW/cm2.

As quoted from the response above:
“The 1,353 W/m2 figure was acknowledged to be a discrepancy in 1982 when they found out the instrument calibration was lower than the actual measurements acquired by rocketry and satellite instruments at that time.”

We have other reliable data from 2002 that shows UVA and UVB at 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2).

Factor in 10+ years of stratospheric particulate injection and resultant ozone destruction on an ozone layer that was not even starting to recover and it is no mystery that we are now seeing around 4X the amount of UV that was hitting the ground on a sunny summer day in the UK in 2002…

We likely had higher readings in Northern California than 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2)in 2002 since the UK is coastal with thicker atmosphere, lower elevation, more moisture content than we have here nearly 100 miles from the coast and at higher elevation of 3,000 feet.

Scientists found very high UV readings in the Antarctic around 1976. This data was kept suppressed until around 1985. Some reports say the instruments must have been faulty, but if you remember the “UV Campaign” of the 1980s it became all too clear that something was dreadfully wrong already.

In the 1990s, the Montreal Protocol had to be amended because the rebound of the damaged ozone layer was not happening as they had hoped.

This gives more than ample reason to question numbers given to us by ALL government agencies since they are actively pressuring scientists to moderate their own data…

We don’t believe that forecast models show the actual UV that is killing trees and wildlife around the world.

Scientists are just now starting to research the whale population that is suddenly (over the last 3 or 4 years) starting to “tan” turning a darker color because of elevated UV.

Scientists tell us that compared to healthy ozone levels, we would see seventy times the normal amounts of UV with zero ozone layer present.

We expect to see UV levels continue to rise at an exponential rate.

---

We have been watching the UV damage to our trees in the Six Rivers National Forest for over a decade, and have been avid hiking enthusiasts since the mid 60s.
A lot of valuable empirical observations were made through those years.

Our recent observations include a group of tress that half are watered every day and half are not watered except by rain.

They are all exhibiting the exact same damage, as in only half the yearly foliage and the crown leaves are curled and burned, a definite known UV damage scenario.
http://uvb.nrel.colostate.edu/UVB/uvb_overview.jsf

If you look at the top bar on the website I linked to, you can see examples of leaf damage from UV, exactly the same as we have seen here and elsewhere.

Russ Tanner, Founder, Administrator, Programmer
GlobalSkywatch.com
My Chemtrail Story