Instruments Showing 30% More UVB Than UVA: Geoengineering Is Destroying the Ozone Layer After we purchased a total irradiance, whole spectrum light meter we have been seeing around 1,300 W/m2 as have others around the US using this same meter. By the way, this whole spectrum meter was designed for solar contractors to assess the wattage needed in the PV panel array being specified for installations.
It is interesting that we see around the same amount of solar power on the ground as the "Solar Constant" in space. That figure, 1,360 W/m2 is an averaged number that is pretty obviously useless in ground based solar research, and a source for much confusion for those unable to think outside the pre-programmed box that the "Authorities" such as Koch Industries, DuPont Chemical or other government agencies under them dictate as reality...
But regardless, we and others are seeing around 1,300 W/m2 of raw solar power on the ground. At the same time we are seeing around 1/10 of that total power in the UV spectrum.
Here is where it gets scary: Total irradiance: 1,304 W/m2 Total UV: 134.5 Wm2 UVA: 55.6 W/m2 UVB: 78.9 W/m2
That's right, our instruments are showing that we are seeing 30% MORE UVB than UVA!!!
This ratio keeps climbing as it has through the nearly 100 days of data logging we have performed.
Do the math.
Followup Comments
We are taking “direct beam” measurements, not averaged across half the planet facing the sun, so of course our numbers are higher.
Many people including disinfo agents that believe the numbers we post are outrageously high are not taking this into account.
We never said that the total UVA/UVB numbers were out of range, what we see that IS out of the norm is the ratio of UVB in the total UV spectrum.
Most sources state that we should see 1%-5% of total UV spectrum as UVB. We are seeing more than 1%-5%.
This would point to ozone degradation as a possible cause for the higher amounts of UVB than expected.
---
That number, 14 mW/cm2 is the averaged total UV in space, or approximately 1/10 of the whole solar irradiance “constant” of 1360 W/m2.
These numbers are averaged across the hemisphere of our planet facing the sun, not the direct beam measurements we are taking with our meters.
---
It is also interesting to note that on August 29, 2013 our Maine USA observer saw 3.32mW/cm2 (33.2W/m2) on a day that the observer noted “as completely cloudy/no sun”
On sunny days he is seeing between 11.78mW/cm2 to 13.99mW/cm2.
As quoted from the response above: “The 1,353 W/m2 figure was acknowledged to be a discrepancy in 1982 when they found out the instrument calibration was lower than the actual measurements acquired by rocketry and satellite instruments at that time.”
We have other reliable data from 2002 that shows UVA and UVB at 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2).
Factor in 10+ years of stratospheric particulate injection and resultant ozone destruction on an ozone layer that was not even starting to recover and it is no mystery that we are now seeing around 4X the amount of UV that was hitting the ground on a sunny summer day in the UK in 2002…
We likely had higher readings in Northern California than 4.5mW/cm2 (45Wm2)in 2002 since the UK is coastal with thicker atmosphere, lower elevation, more moisture content than we have here nearly 100 miles from the coast and at higher elevation of 3,000 feet.
Scientists found very high UV readings in the Antarctic around 1976. This data was kept suppressed until around 1985. Some reports say the instruments must have been faulty, but if you remember the “UV Campaign” of the 1980s it became all too clear that something was dreadfully wrong already.
In the 1990s, the Montreal Protocol had to be amended because the rebound of the damaged ozone layer was not happening as they had hoped.
This gives more than ample reason to question numbers given to us by ALL government agencies since they are actively pressuring scientists to moderate their own data…
We don’t believe that forecast models show the actual UV that is killing trees and wildlife around the world.
Scientists are just now starting to research the whale population that is suddenly (over the last 3 or 4 years) starting to “tan” turning a darker color because of elevated UV.
Scientists tell us that compared to healthy ozone levels, we would see seventy times the normal amounts of UV with zero ozone layer present.
We expect to see UV levels continue to rise at an exponential rate.
---
We have been watching the UV damage to our trees in the Six Rivers National Forest for over a decade, and have been avid hiking enthusiasts since the mid 60s. A lot of valuable empirical observations were made through those years.
Our recent observations include a group of tress that half are watered every day and half are not watered except by rain.
They are all exhibiting the exact same damage, as in only half the yearly foliage and the crown leaves are curled and burned, a definite known UV damage scenario. http://uvb.nrel.colostate.edu/UVB/uvb_overview.jsf
If you look at the top bar on the website I linked to, you can see examples of leaf damage from UV, exactly the same as we have seen here and elsewhere.
Russ Tanner, Founder, Administrator, Programmer GlobalSkywatch.com My Chemtrail Story
In Germany, there is no reliable metering by the government according to http://www.gesundheitsamt.de/alle/umwelt/physik/strahl/nion/uv/mensch.htm. "Obwohl diese Zunahme unumstritten ist, gibt es bislang keine verläßlichen Meßdaten für eine Veränderung der UV-Intensität in Deutschland." (gesundheitsamt.de) "Although this increase (UV-B, Denglisch)) is undisputable, there are not yet reliable metering data for a change of the UV-intensity in Germany." Translation by Denglisch. Obviously, this sentence is from the year 1998.
Recommendations according to the "Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz" (Federal Agency for the radiation protection (Germany)) relating to the "Empfehlung der deutschen Strahlenschutzkommission (SSK) vom Juni 2004" (Recommendation of the German protection commission (SSK) of June 2004)
UV Index 1 UV Index 2
"Low" (niedrig) "No protection necessary" (Kein Schutz notwendig) "Outside stay without danger possible" (Gefahrloser Aufenthalt draußen möglich)
UV Index 3 UV Index 4 UV Index 5
"Middle" (Mittel) "Protection necessary" (Schutz notwendig) "At noon look for shadow, wear a T-Shirt, put on some sunshield skin lotion and wear a hat" (In der Mittagzeit Schatten suchen, T-Shirt anziehen, Sonnencreme auftragen und Hut aufsetzen)
UV Index 6 UV Index 7
"High" (Hoch) "Protection necessary" (Schutz notwendig) "At noon looking for shadow, wearing a T-Shirt, putting on some sunshield skin lotion and wear a hat" (In der Mittagzeit Schatten suchen, T-Shirt anziehen, Sonnencreme auftragen und Hut aufsetzen)
UV Index 8 UV Index 9 UV Index 10
"Very High" (Sehr hoch) "Special protection necessary" (Besonderer Schutz notwendig) "If possible, don't be outside at noon! Absolutely look for the shadow. Wearing a T-Shirt, putting on some sunshield skin lotion wearing a hat is urgently needed." (In der Mittagszeit möglichst nicht draußen aufhalten! Unbedingt Schatten suchen! T-Shirt, Sonnencreme und Hut sind dringend erforderlich)
UV Index 11+
"Extreme" (Extrem) "Special protection necessary" (Besonderer Schutz notwendig) "If possible, don't be outside at noon! Absolutely look for the shadow. Wearing a T-Shirt, putting on some sunshield skin lotion wearing a hat is urgently needed." (In der Mittagszeit möglichst nicht draußen aufhalten! Unbedingt Schatten suchen! T-Shirt, Sonnencreme und Hut sind dringend erforderlich) http://www.bfs.de/de/uv/uv2/uv_messnetz/uvi/erlaeuterungen_uv.html
The interesting thing is that even in Nairobi, Africa the ozone layer seems to be destroyed - at least sometimes during the year. Not only in the polar areas. On the other hand, Rio de Janeiro appears to be not touched by the UV radiation problem.
The values below are metered at the 21rst of each month.
"Dominik Storr requested me to comment the U.S. metering values from Dane.
The momentum to purchase metering equipment, which may measure differentiated UV-A, UV-B and UV-C, was definitely a smart decision from Dane. For clarification: UV is ultraviolet, also the no more visible light beyond the violet part of the rainbow respectively the range of colours. This kind of radiation is shortwavier, tougher and more aggressive than the radiation of the visible spectrum. UV-A - directly bordered to the visible spectrum - is an important component for plant growth if it is consumed moderately - and also for men: For example the synthesis of vitamin D inside the skin needs UV-A. Nobody needs UV-B, not to speak of UV-C. These kinds of radiation are producing Melanoms and are burning the leaves of the plants.
Now to the metering values: I had a longer discussion with Dane, because at first he had published only the change of the relative UV-parts, but no absolute values. Thereby, they were remarkable informations but not really interpretable. Then, Dane has yet delivered a few values, which could be compared with tolerance values, and this way a reasonable picture got out.
Thereby, to the values of Dane: UV-A is within a frame of natural fluctuations unchanged. UV-B is at 1400 per cent above the normal value. This means: instead of 2 hours and twenty minutes with a sunburn back to the hotel room, you would get the same with these values after ten minutes.
This is alarming. It corresponds to the subjective sensation that also in Europe the sun got edgier. If this single measurement by Dane is only approximately representative respectively these values appear occasionally this would be a scandal that neither in Europe nor in the U.S. the responsible authorities are giving out warnings to the public.
But this is only one aspect. Another one is the question of the causes. If I had a light source with a in a series connected filter, and I notice that the incoming light has changed then this may mean that either the light source has changed, or that the quality of the filter has changed. The filter in this metapher is our atmosphere. The light source the sun. Due to the ozone layer in a height between 10 and 40 km the atmosphere has its filter performance. Ozone is O3. It is formed, if UV-B and UV-C hits oxygene. These kinds of radiation split the O2 into two O1, and these are seeking other O2s to hang on them instead of the recombination of the single O1s. If I have plenty of this O3 in the atmosphere, then this O3 is curbing all kinds of aggressive radiations - in the way that the temporary triggering of the associated O1s withdraws energy step by step from this same aggressive radiations.
We deal with a state of equilibrium. Far too tough radiation produces more ozone, more ozone curbs tough radiation. In nature earth would react to an increase of rough radiation from outside with the strengtening of the ozone layer.
Now, men get into this game as men are producing gas or particles which reduce the ozone catalyticly. At the poles this is a catastrophe as the sun comes in so flat respectively in winter it shines that little that the ozone layer can not regenerate itself. Usually it has enough power above populated areas to keep a reasonable state of equilibrium. Also, with the oldknown ozone-killers in the atmosphere it worked this way. Perhaps you remember to the times of the ozone-holes which were measured at the poles when you were concerned about the possiblities that they may grow more than to be expected. This was an expression of a shifted equilibrium.
Now, we have different agents in the sky. Piezo-electric nano crystals which can be changed by electromagnetic signals in a way to free electrons and change the atmosphere into a technical plasma. Exactly in the height between 10 and 40 kilometers - in the ozone layer. Free electrons trigger each chemical reactions, also the destruction of ozone. This would not - I think the masters of the universe think that way - be that bad, as the particles plasma would be UV-opaque and would grant us an artificial UV-protection layer. This matter has only one disadvantage: The ozone layer is stable, regenerates itself by nature. The artificial plasma layer however can rain down, may rip through air movements or thin out. Then, we have a problem because the technical maintenance of the artificial plasma layer by chemtrail airplanes takes time.
This is one reading of the metering values. Dane catched a day without chemtrails, with a defect plasma layer.
The other possible reading is that the light source, our sun, has changed. For that reason one had to demand satellite data, what would be difficult. Don't trust any data which you did not falsify yourself. Sources like the NASA are definitely supposed to be not trusted because NASA is in the spraying matter up to its eyebrows. Maybe somebody may speak Chinese and look into what the Asians have online. Abnormalities would be expectable by the cycle of the sun. But the normal 11-year-rhythm conducts itself abnormal in these years, which indicates a super cycle, and the position of our sun is absolutely unique. We are crossing the equitorial tier of the Milky Way right now. It looks more or less like the rings of the Saturn. There is aplenty of interstellar gas and dust underway and the field physics - which gets noticeable in the cosmology at first by determined angle relations - has a grade of symmetry, which it has only twice by a rotation of the sun around our arm of the galaxy. A true sidereal hour. (German: Sternstunde=hour of the star, Denglisch) Many fields are in equilibrium, many swirles - therefore also the great transformation of the sun plasmas or the magma rollers in the interior of the earth - will get these years the momentum to reverse. This is the stuff which may explain many things, maybe there are processes in outer space which have so far-reaching ramifications to the earth, that it makes sense to some protagonists to spray - and it makes sense to thereby mankind doesn't get into panic.
The question, which of the two scenarios is reality, is not possible to be answered without reliable data from the orbit. Personally, I consider the first scenario to be substantially more probable. Changes in the distribution of sun spectrum in the visible range are not known to me. Why should they suddenly emerge in the UV-realm. But this is only an opinion. My opinion. But what can be truly answered is the question, what should not be sprayed: nano particles, which destroy the ozone layer and brings us into a finally deadly circle of dependance. A dependance from the technocrats, which want to vicitimize according to internal estimates 2 billion men on the altar of their 'Geo-Engineering'. Nano particles should not be sprayed which are not be biologically degradable and will sooner or later kill the whole plant world by cancelling the impetus of cell division for selling their genetic plants by these same technocrats, which are genetically changed in such a manner, that they 'are blind for the light of the inner part of the cell', and nevertheless grow. That way it is described in the publications about the aluminum resistant seed of Monsanto. This was in the Eighties, when nobody even could come to the idea that the interruption of the light-based cell-communication could ever become a problem. This is business practice: Create a problem and offer its solution. I personally would evaluate the publication of the solution before the emergence of the problem as a confession. Maybe the masters are trying it for once with charity, honesty and biologically degradable particles. There was once upon a time a nano-leave fertizer on the base of zeolite and calcite, with the nice name of Megagreen. Perhaps this may be good for an artificial protection shield against sun storms and possibly higher radiation activities of the sun.
For sure, nobody needs the military and surveillance technologies which is feasible with the existing plasmas. Are your listening? I think you read along. You don't have to protect us from nobody. All we need is somebody who is protecting us from you." (Harald Kautz-Vella, translated by Denglisch)
As the New Age Movement is supposed to be part of a "distraction policy" it should be known, that the mentioning of the metapher of a Belt in the statement of Harald Kautz-Vella: "We are crossing the equitorial tier of the Milky Way right now. It looks more or less like the rings of the Saturn." is not equal to this alleged Photon Belt described in Wikipedia: "The Photon Belt (also called the Photon Band, Photon Ring, Manasic Ring, or Golden Nebula) is a spiritual belief, largely linked to some parts of the New Age Movement." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_belt
This way it may be mixed with the thesis of DR. ALEXEY N. DMITRIEV* about the changed planeto-physical state of the earth and other planets in the solar system. It is supposed to be similiar rather to the saturn rings than any photons (therefore: Photon Belt) which are electrons in the visible spectrum. Dust has a bigger physical size than just electrons which would be just higher radiation inside the supposed photon belt. Nevertheless, the interstellar dust discovered by Dr. Alexey N. Dmitriev produces frictions with the heliosphere of the solar system. This heliosphere is quasi the atmosphere of the solar system. And the friction with this dust has consequences for the state within the heliosphere. This way the reasons of the changed planeto-physical state has PHYSICAL reasons and not spiritual ones. As the change state would have - according to Dmitriev - physical causes it ought to be measured adequately with usual metering equipment. Of course, the quality of data is dependent from the quality and reputation of the measurement agent.
Wikipedia explains further, what the New Age Movement refers to: "German engineer and esotericist Paul Otto Hesse (died December 30, 1958) described his beliefs about the Photon Belt and its impact on humanity and planet Earth in his book Der Jüngste Tag (First Edition, 1950)[2] (English:'The Last Day','Doomsday','Judgement Day'). " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_belt And more interestingly: "This book was dictated to him by 'the Word'. Citing Mark 13:32, he says no one can know exactly when we will enter the photon belt.[3]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon_belt Again: "NO ONE CAN KNOW EXACTLY WHEN WE WILL ENTER THE PHOTON BELT" This means that Hesse did not predict any specific date when this supposed light belt will be entered. This is something different from what Dmitriev supposes to happen. His reasoning is based on physical data like the change of temperature on Mars and other celestial objects within the heliosphere. Nevertheless, the picture with the Manasic Belt gives an idea how one has to imagine how the heliosphere is placed within the Milky Way. For that reason the picture works - as a metapher. You just have to replace the word Photonic by Dust. Maybe it is not even a belt crossing the whole galaxy and just a cloud within the Milky Way in our neighbourhood.
"Better than factor 50! New craze sees beach-goers in China wearing colourful 'Face-Kini' to protect skin from harmful rays The protective head mask protects skin from sun and jellyfish stings Is being used along Shandong province's East China Sea coast The colourful masks sell for about 25 yuan (£2.50) By CAROL DRIVER FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 10:58 GMT, 15 August 2014 | UPDATED: 14:02 GMT, 15 August 2014
A balaclava-style mask is the latest trend in China to stop the sun's harmful rays.
Coming in a range of colours, the 'Face-Kini', which comes complete with a body suit, covers a swimmer's entire head and neck - down to the collar bone.
