Chemtrails & Geoengineering Information & Activism.

October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (Russ Tanner), 12,593 guests, and 161 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
ShoutChat
Support Our Forum
Popular Topics(Views)
Credits & Thanks!
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#7546 10/16/13 01:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Research_Council_(United_States)


The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington
DC 20001
T. 202.334.2000
http://www.nationalacademies.org/nasem/







"(...)
From 1963 to 1965 Dr. Teller subsequently served on The Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, and on the Panel on Weather and Climate Modification of the US National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
(...)"
http://www.fas.org/man/eprint/leitenberg/weather.pdf , page 43
(Look also to the attachment.)


National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Atmospheric Sciences 1973, Weather & climate modification : problems and progress, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C
ISBN 978-0-309-02121-0
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/9172551

Attachments
Attached PDF document
weather.pdf (127.12 KB, 518 downloads)
Attached PDF document
Last edited by Denglisch; 03/16/17 11:24 AM.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
Chair, Committee on Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research
"The NRC Committee emphasizes that weather modification should be viewed as a fundamental and legitimate element of atmospheric and environmental science."
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/critical_issues_in_weather_modification.asp


Garstang refers to:

Committee on the Status and Future Directions in U.S Weather Modification Research and Operations, National Research Council
Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research
Washington, D.C. (2003)
Paperback 144 pages | 8 1/2 x 11
ISBN 978-0-309-09053-7

Content:
"The weather on planet Earth is a vital and sometimes fatal force in human affairs. Efforts to control or reduce the harmful impacts of weather go back far in time. In this, the latest National Academies assessment of weather modification, the committee was asked to assess the ability of current and proposed weather modification capabilities to provide beneficial impacts on water resource management and weather hazard mitigation. It examines new technologies, reviews advances in numerical modeling on the cloud and mesoscale, and considers how improvements in computer capabilities might be applied to weather modification. Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research examines the status of the science underlying weather modification in the United States. It calls for a coordinated national research program to answer fundamental questions about basic atmospheric processes and to address other issues that are impeding progress in weather modification."
http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10829

Attachments
garstang.gif
Last edited by Denglisch; 10/16/13 04:08 PM.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
"CRITICAL ISSUES IN WEATHER MODIFICATION

Statement of

Michael Garstang, Ph.D.
Professor, University of Virginia
and
Chair, Committee on Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
Division on Earth and Life Studies
National Research Council
The National Academies

before the

Subcommittee on Disaster Prevention and Prediction
and
Subcommittee on Science and Space
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

United States Senate

on

November 10, 2005


Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee. My name is Michael Garstang, and I am a Distinguished Emeritus Research Professor in the Department of Environmental Sciences at the University of Virginia. I’m a fellow of the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and have served on numerous AMS committees. I was also the chair of the 2003 National Research Council’s (NRC) Committee on Critical Issues in Weather Modification Research. The National Research Council is the operating arm of the National Academies, chartered by Congress in 1863 to advise the government on matters of science and technology.

This afternoon I will give you a brief summary of the status of weather modification research, as described in our NRC report, the major uncertainties that exist, and convey the committee’s conclusions and recommendations. We will also provide an Executive Summary of the report which lists the key findings and recommendations in greater detail.

Efforts to minimize harmful weather impacts go back far in time. In the last 30 years, significant evidence has accumulated that human activities unintentionally affect the weather on scales ranging from local to global. Many of the same fundamental principles underlie both intentional and unintentional weather modification. Yet during this 30-year time period, there has been a progressive decline in weather modification research. Research support related to weather modification in the United States had dropped to less than $0.5M per year in 1999 from a high of $20M in the late 1970s. During the same period, there have been significant advances in technology. This has greatly improved our ability to observe, understand, and predict the weather. These advances, however, have not been either collectively or persistently applied to the problem of weather modification.

This decline in research is likely the result of a combination of factors, including early overly-optimistic claims, unrealistic expectations, and failure to provide scientifically demonstrable successes. But despite these limitations, and because of considerable pressures resulting from drought, hail, floods, and storm damage, private and state agencies actually spend significant resources on attempts to modify the weather. In 2001, there were 66 operational weather modification programs in 10 states and much more activity overseas.

How do we overcome this disparity between our willingness to attempt to modify weather and our reluctance to fund research to understand such activities? The 2003 National Academies committee that I chaired was charged to provide an updated assessment of the current state and the future of weather modification research, from new technologies to advances in numerical modeling and operations. A summary of our report is included in my written testimony. In my comments, I want to focus on our conclusions and recommendations.

First, with a few exceptions, the committee concluded that there still is no convincing scientific proof of the efficacy of intentional weather modification efforts. In some instances encouraging results have been observed, but this evidence has not been subjected to adequate testing.

Second, despite this lack of proof, the committee concluded that scientific understanding has progressed on many fronts. For instance, there have been substantial improvements in the ice-nucleating capabilities of new seeding materials. Also, new technologies such as satellite imagery are giving us tools to better understand the microphysical processes that lead to precipitation, and these advances, in time can help focus and optimize weather modification research.

Third, the committee stated that if progress in establishing our capability to modify the weather is to be made, intellectual and technical resources must be brought to bear on the key uncertainties that hamper progress. For example, there are critical gaps in our understanding of the complex chain of physical processes that lead to rain, snow, and hail.

Finally, and most importantly, the committee called for the establishment of a coordinated national program of weather modification research designed to reduce these and other key uncertainties. The program should consist of a sustained research effort that uses a balanced approach of modeling, laboratory studies, and field measurements. Instead of focusing on near-term operational applications of weather modification, the program should address fundamental research questions. It should take full advantage of recent related research and advances in observational, computational, and statistical technologies, by:

• Capitalizing on new remote and in situ observational tools to carry out exploratory and confirmatory experiments in a variety of cloud and storm systems;

• Improving model treatment of cloud and precipitation physics;

• Improving the use of current computational and data assimilation methods; and

• Capitalizing on existing field facilities and developing partnerships among research groups and select operational programs.

In the committee’s opinion, it is premature to initiate large-scale operational weather modification programs. However, a great opportunity exists to coordinate research efforts to address the fundamental questions that will lead to credible scientific results. Focused investigation of atmospheric processes, coupled with technological applications, will advance understanding and bring many unexpected benefits and results. In time, this research will place us in a position to determine whether, how, and to what extent weather and weather systems can be modified.

CLOSING THOUGHTS

The NRC Committee emphasizes that weather modification should be viewed as a fundamental and legitimate element of atmospheric and environmental science. Owing to the growing demand for fresh water, the increasing levels of damage and loss of life resulting from severe weather, the undertaking of operational activities without the guidance of a careful scientific foundation, and the reality of inadvertent atmospheric changes, the scientific community now has the opportunity, challenge, and responsibility to assess the potential efficacy and value of intentional weather modification technologies.

Thank you for the opportunity to testify. I would be happy to answer any questions the Subcommittees might have."
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/testimony/critical_issues_in_weather_modification.asp


"Owing to the growing demand for fresh water, the increasing levels of damage and loss of life resulting from severe weather, the undertaking of operational activities without the guidance of a careful scientific foundation, and the reality of inadvertent atmospheric changes, the scientific community now has the opportunity, challenge, and responsibility to assess the potential efficacy and value of intentional weather modification technologies." (Garstang)

Fresh water is available through the Osmosis process.

The question of "severe weather" demands to the investigation what came first: Severe weather due to already applied climate modification techniques or Application of climate modification techniques with following severe weather sceneries.

As we have seen the topic is closely connected to possible secret activities for decades. Partly modification activities are in the open, partly modification activities are in the secret.

Because of this dual conduct nobody can really discuss this matter openly. And politicians like Daniel Cohn-Bendit ( http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=6958#Post6958 ) or Dennis J. Kucinich ( http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=6960#Post6960 ) keep their mouth shut after being courageously.

What is really interesting is the circumstance that in the context of meteorology the "scientifical complex" is so dominant that the power administrators - the politicians - are not able to act according to their roles. They give the responsibilities to the "scientists" who are not elected.

This "scientifical complex" has its own interests it is following. This kind of evidence is shown for example by the remark of David Keith at the AAAS meeting in San Diego in 2010 about aluminum which indeed is very widespread in the earth crust. The reference to the responsibility of Carnegie Melon by David Keith showed that the investigation of Carnegie Melon was not "peer reviewed" which is normally the procedure before results are being taken scientifically seriously. This rude violation of scientifical rules by David Keith shows the mentality in which this branch may prosper.

This kind of conduct is only possible because this kind of matter - the meteorology - is partly dealt secretly.

What is seen on "Weather Shows" is only the surface of the software.

The software technique is not even discussed:
Originally Posted by Denglisch
"US Congress, Senate, Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce, Weather Modification Research, Hearing, Washington D.C. US Govt. Printing Office, March 18-19, 1958; Lowell Ponte quotes Capt. Orville as reporting
'that the Dept. of Defense was studying ways to manipulate
the charges of earth and sky and so affect the weather I by means of 'an electronic beam to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area' .... Capt. Orville also discussed ongoing US Air Force experiments with 'sodium vapor, ejected from jet planes to intercept solar radiation' over enemy countries and rain their weather.'
(The Cooling, op. cit. pp. 168-169.)"
http://www.fas.org/man/eprint/leitenberg/weather.pdf , page 42
(Look also to the attachment.)

PONTE, Lowell (1976). The cooling. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall. ISBN 013172312X 9780131723122 (WorldCat)
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/2091613

http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=7547#Post7547

Today it is probably not "sodium vapor" it is presumably nano aluminum material which behaves quite differently from earth crust aluminum.

This different behaviour of nano material in comparison to normal material is the reason for the economic boom in the nano industry. This is quite o.k. for my part but before being marketed it must be proofed healthy for the environment.


The topic of "weather" is always a topic of smalltalk. If one doesn't have anything to talk about one talks about the weather - the surface.



Last edited by Denglisch; 10/17/13 11:20 AM.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
Final Report of the Panel on Weather and Climate Modification
to the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, National
Academy of qciences-National Research Council;
"Weather and Climate Modification,"
Volume I - Summary and Recommendations,
Publication No. 1350, 1966, pg vii

in:
A Recommended National Program
In Weather Modification

A Report to the
Interdepartmental Committee for
Atmospheric Sciences
Homer E. Newell
by
Associate Administrator for Space Science and Application
National Aeronautics Si Space Administration
Washington, D.C.
Interdepartmental Committee
for
Atmospheric Sciences
Page 2




"A RECOMMENDED NATIONAL PROGRAM IN WEATHER MODIFICATION
INTRODUCTION
The earth's weather has a profound influence on
agriculture, forestry, water resources, industry, commerce,
transportation, construction, field operations,
commercial fishing, and many other human activities.
Adverse effects of weather on man's activities and the
earth's resources are extremely costly, amounting to
billions of dollars per year, sometimes causing
irreparable damage as when human lives are lost in
severe storms. There is, therefore, great motivation
to develop effective countermeasures against the
destructive effects of weather, and, conversely, to
enhance the beneficial aspects. The financial and
other benefits to human welfare of being able to
modify weather to augment water supplies, reduce
lightning, suppress hail, mitigate tornados, and
inhibit the full development of hurricanes would be
very great.
Over the past twenty years experiments have been
conducted on weather modification, particularly on the
effects of seedinq- clouds with such materials as
silver iodide crystals. The results are limited.
Under suitable circumstances it has been possible to
augment precipitation by ten to twenty percent, and to
reduce the frequency of fire-producing lightning
strokes. Effects on hail production have been noted,
sometimes suppression and sometimes augmentation.
These results probably would be of only passing interest
were it not for the potential importance to mankind
of further progress in this field. Perhaps the most
significant result of the experiments to date has been
to bring about a change in attitude from one of
skeptici9m to one of cautious optimism. The limited
success to date is encouraging, and underscores the
importance of pressing forward with the necessary research
to understand the dynamics of weather systems that will
have to be dealt with in any efforts at weather modification.
The gradually accumulating evidence of positive
results from efforts at weather modification led the
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences of the National
Academy of Sciences, in November 1963,to appoint a
Panel on Weather and Climate Modification "to undertake
a deliberate and thoughtful review of the present status
and activities in this field and of its potential and
limitations for the future." (*) The Panel made its report
at the beginning of this calendar year (Ref. 1). The
composition of the NAS Panel is given in App. I, together
with a list of the Panel's recommendations. Elaboration
and discussion of these recommendations may be found
in Ref. 1.
On June 16, 1964, the Director of the National
Science Foundation announced the appointment of a
Special Commission on Weather Modification.
in its review of the field, the Commission activated
seven subgroups to study the physical, biological,
statistical, social, international, legal and legislative,
and administration and funding aspects of
weather and climate modification. The membership of
the Commission and a list of the principal recommendations
of the Commission are attached (App. 11).
Fdrther elaboration and discussions of those recommendations
may be found in the Commission's report and
the report of the subgroups (Refs. 2 and 3).

With the growing conviction of positive and potential
results, a number of government agencies have been
developing plans for research and ultimately operational
programs in weather and climate modification. Some of
these plans stem from the desire to use weather modification
to meet specific mission responsibilities such
as development of water resources, protection of crops,
protection against forest fires, ecc: Other plans stem
- m dire= responsibility for furthering our understanding
of weather and its uses. A summary report,
"Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in
Weather-Climate Modification," dated June 20, 1966, was
prepared for the Interdepartmental Committee for
Atnospheric Sciences (ICAS) by a Select Panel on Weather
Modification (App. 111). -Whereas the ICAS Select Panel
report reflected a desirable vigor in pressing forward
in this important field, nevertheless, it raised a
number of questions as to the soundness and adequacy of
proposed plans, the validity of cost estimates, the
availsbility of trained people to meet the schedules
proposed, overlapping of research activities, duplication
of proposed facilities, responsibility for coordination
and reporting, and responsibility for regulation and
control.

To discharge its responsibilities, ICAS must provide
answers to these questions and make appropriate recommendations.
To this end, the Chairman of ICAS, Dr. Herbert
Hollomon, asked me to review the proposed plans and to
submit recommendations that might be adopted by ICAS for
a report to Dr. Donald F. Hornig, Director of the Office
of Science and Technology, Executive Office of the President.

____________________________________________________________

(*) Final Report of the Panel on Weather and Climate Modification
to the Committee on Atmospheric Sciences, National
Academy of qciences-National Research Council; "Weather
and Climate Modification," Volume I-Summary and Recommendations,
Publication No. 1350, 1966, pg vii"
http://chemtrailsplanet.files.wordp...ather-modification-program-nasa-1966.pdf

Attachments
Attached PDF document
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member

Attachments
usweathermodificatio96bh2jx4.jpg
Last edited by Denglisch; 10/25/13 01:09 PM.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member

Attachments
assets-climatecentral-org-images-uploads-blogs-projects-wildfiretracker-338x226.jpg
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
Solar Radiation Management (SRM) in Washington, D.C. according to ETC Group
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=8055#Post8055

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
Weather and climate modification problems and prospects final report of the Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Atmospheric Sciences.
Washington, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1966.
Publication (National Research Council (U.S.)), no. 1350.
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/760783139



Look also to:
1965: WEATHER AND CLIMATE MODIFICATION Report of the SPECIAL COMMISSION ON WEATHER MODIFICATION
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=18549#Post18549

Attachments
1489658584304.png 1489658715220.png
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
Weather and climate modification : Problems and prospects. 2. Research and development.
National Research Council. Committee on Atmospheric Sciences.
Washington : National Acad. of Sciences, 1966.
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/633748210


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1