I am posting this article as a call for help. For professional reasons I need to keep what I am saying here anonymous and I don’t know who would be the safest authority to give this information to. Hopefully someone will read this on here and know what to do.

I had always been sceptical of chemtrails as I live at a spot where many air “corridors” intersect and have always seen collections of contrails in the sky. Contrary to many reports by the pro-contrail lobby these can, do, and always have been able to persist for up to several hours depending on wind speed, pressure, advective heating/cooling effects etc. In fact it would be impossible to differentiate visually between trails deriving from normal jet engine efflux and those with a more sinister origin. The fact is that what I see regularly are overwhelmingly likely to be just a concentration of simple vapour trails.

However recently something happened which made me reconsider my opinion. Part of my professional job is analysis of flue-gas dissipation from manufacturing facilities as well as general air quality monitoring for the aviation industry. As I was leaving to go out into the field I saw something which made me pause for thought. Among the web of trails - some current, some persisting from prior overflights – was an aircraft travelling roughly away from me. I would guess it to be at a relatively low altitude for a cruising airliner, say FL150 to FL200. It was a small to medium twin such as a 737 or A320 series. At first glance it was hard to say what drew my attention to it, something just didn’t ring true. However, due to the angle of the light it soon became obvious that the vapour issuing from the wing region was different to anything I’ve seen before. The best way I can describe it is like the shadowy precipitation you often see coming from clouds when backlit by the sun. Obviously it dissipated well before it reached the ground (probably only a hundred feet or so below the plane) but it was very obviously descending. From the plane’s relative heading I was pretty sure that I would already be within the footprint of the vapour.

Fortunately, in the van I had a number of analytical instruments including an optical colorimetric comparator and a high speed particulate sampler which captures, concentrates and contains atmospheric samples for later, more accurate, lab analysis.

To cut a long story short, having accepted the possibility that chemtrails might be more real than I imagined, I was expecting to find barium or aluminium in the results of the tests as suggested by other articles on the composition of chemtrails. What I actually found both surprised and greatly worried me. I really am at a loss what to do. Do I risk making these findings public only to be discredited/accused of spreading panic or is there a better way of approaching the relevant authorities. For obvious reasons I cannot afford to risk my professional reputation by escalating this up the chain of reporting that would normally appertain in cases of contamination. I sincerely hope someone on here can suggest a possible course of action. The following will give some indication of the severity of the situation I found.

The optical analysis revealed a small specular component indicating the presence of a refracting, crystalline material. Chemical/physical testing revealed this as potassium iodide of reasonable laboratory purity. The bulk of the plume, however, consisted of an opaque material, obviously solid and relatively dense which explains the descending cascade nature of the trail. Microscopic study of the filtrate showed microcrystals of KI coated in what appeared to be a deposited layer of a rapidly biodegradable alginate compound. The refractive component was simply crystalline KI which had lost its coating and had not yet been eroded to opacity as was the case with much of the uncoated material.

As you may be aware, in the past potassium iodide has been used as a prophylactic in cases of suspected area contamination with sources of radioactive iodine. The idea is that by ingesting sufficient “safe” iodine, the thyroid gland is unable to absorb and store any radio-iodine to which it may be exposed thus lessening the chances of radioactivity-related carcinomas. Presumably the use of the alginate coating gives the particles sufficient density to ensure a controlled application without unnecessary drift whilst ensuring that the efficacy of the iodide is guaranteed as soon as the alginate dissolves in the moisture of the recipient’s mucous membranes. I have been unable to identify any other likely reasons for which iodine compounds could possibly be used so it is difficult NOT to assume that there has been an unreported release of radio-iodine or, more likely given the lack of detection by third parties, an expectation of a future release. Either of these scenarios is obviously very worrying although the collected samples themselves did not exhibit more than the background rate of radioactivity.

However concerns regarding the iodine pale into insignificance when considering the other materials identified in the samples. Although making up less than 0.5% of the total particulate mass, this has the potential to be truly terrifying in its significance. Microscopic observation revealed a finely ground powder with a distinct green hue. Initially thought to be some kind of industrial pigment, possibly unconnected with the aerial discharge. However, mass spectrometry revealed that this was something altogether more unworldly – sufficiently so that it aroused a little unwelcome suspicion on the part of the lab techs. This revealed a series of peaks corresponding to a couple of transuranic elements, a significant amount of mercury and lead, and traces of zinc and iron. The elements were physically amalgamated but no true alloying had been carried out. Presumably the lead was present to counter the radioactive signature of the transuranics and the mercury which binds the mixture will eventually leach out, leaving the contactee exposed to the other elements. It does not take specialised scientific knowledge to determine the dangerous nature of this amalgam. The majority of its components are hazardous in their own rights and the substance is too obviously engineered to be anything other than part of deliberate scheme to expose selected populated areas to such hazards albeit in a small amount. The only defined material which contains these elements in the detected proportions is an alloy known colloquially as “Hybrid K”, though this contains other elements, suggesting that the substance seen here is a precursor to this more complex material. From my limited knowledge of Hybrid K I would suggest that this is more active than the sum of its parts. Effectively, the target population has been “seeded” with a subclinical dosage of the precursor in anticipation of a future exposure to those elements which would complete the Hybrid K.

It is known that the synthetically derived Hybrid K has a debilitating effect on the human body in diametrical opposition to its naturally occurring form, crystalline Kryptonite, which affects only those of Krypton origin. In case of mass population exposure, therefore, it would be advisable for any reader of this article who is in communication with Kent (or his alter ego) to request as much help as possible. I am sure that there are many such among the present readership. Your time has arrived. You may yet be needed to save the world.