Check out this 1hr 45min vid.
Maybe open dialog was required due to the amount of death threats Keith has been receiving as of late?

David Keith vs "We are Change Calgary"

He still totally denies that anyone he is involved with is doing any kind of spraying. A great deal of his comments sound very familiar to what you would find originating from internet contrail shills ie: his insistence that the entire chemtrail community believes that it is being done by commercial airlines (What's up with that?) - I am sure most would agree that the planes in question are either unmarked, or military, or cargo contractor companies such as Evergreen or Cargolux.

*They should have been better prepared for this.
*They should have came armed with Keith's Aurora report.
*They should have delved more into his opinions on his relationship to Bill Gates through FICER and how he feels about being associated with a proven / documented Malthusian proponent of eugenics - in a tactful manor of course.
*They should have argued the fact that persistent contrails require cloud condensation nuclei for the persistence to persist by attracting moisture to form water droplets and ice crystals that become visual clouds. --- It is what is being used as cloud condensation nuclei that we are concerned with here.
*They should know from the amounts provided in Keith's own Aurora report, that it would not take a truck load of his special alumina to fill a plane. By his own documents it shows that it would only take something like 5.6 Kg of his alumina 2.5um nano dust to leave a "persistent contrail" from horizon to horizon (extrapolating from his comment that alumina is 4X more efficient by weight than sulfur - visual from ground to a plane @ approx 35,000ft)
*They should have directly asked: To your knowledge and for the record; you have no knowledge of any organization or associates that are involved in Phase II, CE Climatic Research which includes open air testing of the release of any type of particulate matter - fully recognizing that the standard practice of low altitude commercial cloud seeding operations is totally apart from this?
It was textbook shill - the requirements Keith was requesting and his referring to 40's and 50's images from the (I'm sure) Contrailscience web site (AKA misdirection central). Of course the scientific community is compartmentalized as is government - funding for experimentation will be buried in a sea of acronyms and double speak. There will be no damning document and traceable chain of custody - that is the world we live in today - obscuration and lack of accountability.

Keith should have known that he would be putting his head on the block by being one of the main salesman / mouthpiece. I do think there are honest people/officials still out their and that is why this whole neo economy based on carbon has hiccuped/stumbled. Copenhagen, Kyoto, the G whatever's contained a handful of people that were not willing to go to full court press and come out with taxing us for our own demise. We have a small window of opportunity at present to press for exposure as these "tests" continue overhead.

Don't get me wrong. I am thankful that "we are change Calgary" did the interview, however they appeared very fragmented and scattered in their presentation. Hopefully they will be offered another interview in the near future and will have their poop in a row next time around.



What we really need is to focus and rally towards is organizing for in flight samples and a carefully designed chain of custody for the handling of the results/evidence.

You can quote me on this - This will be the nail in the coffin, the smoking gun.
Then we will see if Mr. Keith will follow through with his commitment to dedicate himself to exposing and turning against his fellow climate associates/stakeholders.