I can't recall, that was quite a while back when I posted there. Maybe the message was too bold for them to handle.
I remember rambling something off about geoengineering being the white horse of the apocalypse - or some such. And my picture wasn't of my hand, but had the word "clue" on the side of bomb being toted by a pixy over a mountain range.
Does that help?
Sorry for taking so long to get back, been studying.
Michael is a good man and has done more by creating his documentary than most other researchers have been able to accomplish over the past 15 years. He and Ed Griffin realized that a professional, cool headed approach to public exposure is the most effective way to force the issue so that we can get the to the answers, and in no way is the battle over. Every day, the numbers of people grow that want to know exactly what you are asking.
We are getting closer and we will expose this.
There is no easy answer to this, but the plan has been in the works for quite some time. Since I began researching I have traveled many a mile - here is only a fraction - and by no means does it include all of the parties involved. If you really wanted to point a finger in a general direction, I would strongly suggest the problem lay in the link between government and the internationalists that infest it through the Council on Foreign Relations, Department of Foreign Affairs and the stakeholder funded scientific community.
"Solar engineering is like chemotherapy. No one wants it, but we all want the ability to do chemo and to understand its risks should we find ourselves with dangerous cancer." David Keith
David Victor - Atmospheric Additives and Fostering the Fear Factor towards Economic Addiction: "But once the process of geoengineering begins—whether unilateral or collective—it is likely the world will be unable to stop. For whatever the ills of global climate change, it is probably even more dangerous to let the climate experience the even more rapid warming that would follow the dismantling of geoengineering systems."
Read: Or - Climate Security could be used to influence or offset other "stressors" "The balance for the appropriate roles of governments and of markets in achieving the goal of a climate secure society is an important question; which investments are robust and resilient to climate pressures? Climate security needs to be in the context of other stressors such as globalization, an aging society, other security issues such as terrorism and pandemics." Climate Security - the implications...alth, food, economic and social security
Very important video UN_UNCED_Earth_Summit_1992 - if anything, out of all of these links, listen to what is said here. (And this was produced quite some time ago - still nothing has been done to heed the warning)
The setup: U.S. Global Change Research Act of 1990 “With this manifestation I will highlight the climate crisis, and the fact, that it is not only a problem for the polar bears and the nature. The global warming may be a catastrophe for humanity. UN says that over 200 million refugees will be a reality in the next 40 years. The refugees will trigger a giant demographic crisis, with risks of closing the national borders and beginning an ‘all against all fight, to protect our territory against the refugees, which our own CO2 leak has created. A frightening scenario that will put our humanistic and democratic civilisation under intense pressure, so that war and rise of totalitarian systems might be the consequence. This is the legacy that we will leave to our children!”. Galschiot -- social conditioning artist
Oh!! and we'll top it off with a juicy one I just found. Note\ you need to download Power Point viewer. Pay close attention to something that is mentioned as "the allowed zone"???