This sophisticated piece of propaganda lays the ground work for you to reach predetermined conclusions. It contains 3 different types of disinformation:
(1) "Propagandic Assumption"
Here is the opening line:
"As the threat of global warming grows more urgent, a few scientists are considering radical - and possibly extremly dangerous - schemes for reengineering."
This statement contains a "Propagandic Assumption". This method of disinformation embeds an assumption within a larger statement.
The statement being made is about"radical - and possibly extremly dangerous - schemes for reengineering".
The embedded assumption is "the threat of global warming grows more urgent".
In effect, this single sentence is making 2 entirely different statements.
The goal here is clearly to maintain the public's belief in global warming.
Most of us understand that global warming is a hoax promoted for the purpose of achieving certain monetary and political objectives, but the fact that mainstream media continues to promote it tells us something about their future plans. I'll expand on this in section #3 below.
(2) "Temporal Deflection"
Another propagandic method utilized in this article is "temporal deflection". This is the process of exposing an idea in the context of the future when, in reality, it is already underway.
We clearly see this method being utilized today.
Chemtrails saturate the skies and are witnessed by millions globally, yet mainstream media continues to saturate itself with geoengineering articles set in the future.
Unaware people experiencing this type of disinformation are unable to accept the possibility that geoengineering is currently underway. Subconsciously, they cannot accept that a lie would be this blatant.
Those who have studied history realize that most sizable historical lies are not only blatant, but publicly exposed; that is, the public was exposed to the opposing truth but simply could not accept it.
This is precisely the situation we find ourselves in today.
(3) "Implied Concession"
The writer of this article is attempting to make a deal with you on a subconscious level. He is trying to get you to concede (give up) one of your beliefs. In order to get you to agree to this concession, he is offering you a concession in return.
He is offering you the truth about the danger of geoengineering. In the article's opening statement, it clearly associates geoengineering with danger, and you - as an educated reader - are attracted to this idea because you know it's true. This truth fosters an emotional connection to the article, and it entices you to keep reading.
It's a long article meant to wear you down, and the true intent is to get you to concede your belief about global warming in exchange for the (true) idea that currently proposed methods of geoengineering are dangerous.
You must first understand that global warming is an object of fear. This fear is necessary to get the public (you) to agree to give public money to the government (ultimately destined for government contractors) to "fight" the cause of this fear.
Those of you who are educated about the way the public has been coerced into numerous "wars" or about the concept of false-flag attacks should understand how fear mongering has been used by mainstream media for decades.
This object of fear - global warming - is not something they will ever want to concede, but they are willing to concede the safety of currently proposed methods of geoengineering.
Why are they willing to make this concession?
First, because geoengineering is already occurring, and the longer they can draw out this false debate about "future" methods of geoengineering, the longer they can continue to spray the public now, without public knowledge.
Second, because they may want to implement some type of "geoengineering" in the future, and so long as their concession about proposed methods of geoengineering coerces you to deaden your public protest of global warming, then they have gained considerable ground because the object of fear that they created - global warming - is the one-and-only possible justification for geoengineering.
So long as you - the public - believes in global warming, they can - at some future time - propose geoengineering in some other form, or under some new name. However, if you refuse to accept the global warming myth, then they have lost their one-and-only justification for geoengineering. They will have also lost (more of) the general faith of the public, which is the only force that continues to allow them to exude control.
This is the central reason why we should never, ever compromise the truth. We must never concede that global warming exists. If we do, then it will be used as a weapon against the public in the future. It will be used to "justify" some kind of future geoengineering that will be just as harmful as the one in use right now.
It is also possible that they will - one day - admit that geoengineering has been going on for years and that global warming was averted by their "noble" - albeit secret - effort. If the public believes that global warming exist, then current secret geoengineering programs could be "justified" in the future, but without the support of the global warming lie, they have nothing to stand on, and that is as it should be.
This is the bottom line: There is no global warming, so there is no need for geoengineering. The debate over the safety of geoengineering is moot - obsolete. It simply does not matter.
Considering that chemtrails (geoengineering) are strongly evidenced to contain aluminum and barium, and considering the extreme toxicity of these metals to human, animals, and plant life, we must consider how many people have already died as a result of it.
In the future, globalists may claim that these casualties were necessary to save the planet, but without the object of fear (global warming), they will have no justification for their actions, and their actions will be considered murderous.
Finally
As I step back and watch this kind of sophisticated disinformation manipulate the public, I am saddened at the public's naivete and at the eventual destruction that will result from their willful ignorance and inaction.
It does not have to be like this, and it won't be, if the public opens their eyes and becomes educated and involved, but at this point, there is little time left.
---
Send links to these videos to your friends so they can realize that global warming is a for-profit hoax.
![[Linked Image]](http://orbisvitae.com/ForumExtras/Images/iaqrwyehww.jpg)