Is this in reference to governance?
I suppose, if I wanted to get thrown into Boston harbor or more than likely be charged with treason and hung from the nearest lamp post.

This unity already exists under NATO, the very same group responsible for past and ongoing spray operations and it has been this round table that gets its Agenda 21 directives via the UN.

By diluting with Europe, I can only see this as a step to further erode and weaken the voice of the activist community here. The UK has already proven that its citizens are allot further down the path in regards to allowing themselves to be oppressed under a nanny state. Why on earth would any sovereign look to entrust them with our freedoms especially with what is happening to all of us right now?

Now if you are referring to the linking up of activists; rounding everyone up into one manageable organization puts the whole movement at risk. Those days of naivety are long gone. We live in different times now where it is more advantageous to have individuals or cells that can carry on in a unified effort. I believe we already have that and I am sure that many of us from all over the world carry the same burden - to bring down this corrupt system from within and we will succeed without the difficulties of binding ourselves down with the bureaucracy that normally accompanies mono socialistic lobby groups.

This is definitely the wrong door to be beating on, suggesting this actually makes us part of the problem and not the solution.
In my opinion we would be chasing our tails right up to our untimely deaths by going this route.