Note that in this video the geoengineers make it clear that they could have had their conference (I think it was the Asilomar meeting) behind closed doors, but they want to involve the public.

This is why it makes no difference whether the purpose of chemtrails is to kill us or make us sick or whether the idea is to "mitigate global warming". The geoengineering/global warming mitigation discussion is the discussion to which we are being invited and therefore the only discussion that can even look like being two-way interaction.

David Keith and his henchmen have been assigned the task of selling the necessity of geoengineering to the public. In the face of this, it is not enough just to say "David Keith is insane" as they say at Geoengineering Watch. One must make it clear that one is going to boycott, ostracise, use every method of opposition short of violence, to sabotage this public relations campaign, and the people who are running it: the Keiths, Caldeiras, Robocks, etc.

One does not acknowledge their right to speak on geoengineering. Only scientists supporting Hands off Mother Earth are acceptable.

That is a clear political position, not just a statement of preference. And it does not displace the discussion onto the more general subject of climate change, because the mainstream climate change sceptics are NOT going to help us fight the Keiths and Caldeiras on the subject of geoengineering. They want us to talk about THEIR subject, leaving us the right to draw our private inferences if we wish, but NOT getting involved in discussion on OUR subject, chemtrails/geoengineering, unless it is to be in favour.

To wax ironical about the moratorium and depict the ETC group as tools of the NWO because they receive funding from the Ford Foundation or whatever, is to AVOID confrontation at the only interface we are being offered: the moratorium.