OK, so you refuse to look at the data because you have a philosophical exemption.
The subject I want to discuss is chemtrails and geoengineering, not global warming.
What I know about the global warming debate is that both sides of it were set up by the same institutions that set up the Cold War nuclear arms race, having helped the Soviet Union get the bomb and then scapegoating some pathetic small-timers the Rosenbergs.
I have no more intention of discussing global warming with you than I would have got into an argument with you twenty years ago or more about US nuclear weapons being offensive and Soviet nuclear weapons defensive. These appear to be the kinds of discussion you want to have. Is that right?? “Political” discussions.
Once we accept the truth - that global warming is a wholesale scientific fraud - then all other discussions about chemtrails and geoengineering are moot.
(Edward Teller, geoengineering advocate)
In this respect our discussion is repetitive. I keep making this point. You keep ignoring it.
As I stated previously, this is a setup for global treaties that completely override national governments in order to centralize power to solve a problem that does not exist.
If you want people in other countries to place more trust in the government of the United States than in the United Nations you had better start doing something to show that you can influence the government of the United States to start acting the way we want. If you can’t do that, what grounds can you have for appealing to people to respect the United States government and not respect the United Nations? Answer this question please, because it is basic.
In summary, the tactic of allowing dangerous politically-charged unscientific lies to continue is a tactic that could only be proposed by someone who is either very deceived, or working as counter-intelligence.
How nice it would be if someone were paying me to do what I am doing. So far only the government of Cyprus has shown any sign whatsoever of being even marginally responsive to the problematic we elaborate on this forum, and I am not on their payroll. No governments are helping with what we are trying to do. I say “we” because I think you really are concerned about chemtrails.
Again, you avoided (once again) the question about how you are going to "ask" your UN representative why global warming has not stopped after the moratorium.
You must be making a mistake here. You mean why the spraying has not stopped after the moratorium.
I prefer to phrase the question differently. The question I want to ask is why they have signed a moratorium they show no signs of respecting of observing. This puts the onus on them to explain what purposes they believe the spraying is serving.
To answer your question, I have initiated contact with a Greek scientist who was present at in Nagoya (or at least with her secretary) and I hope to be able to ask her questions. Also, one of the Greek parliamentarians who has raised the chemtrails issue in parliament rang me yesterday to get information about the moratorium. The Greek scientist, Katsaros, who is most associated by the Greek public with the chemtrails issue has been interviewed frequently recently and has emphasized the moratorium (and the Enouranois website), on Cypriot television and in the Greek print media.
So in other words I am pursuing the strategy I outlined to you. How are you progressing with your climate scepticism and states-rights strategy?
“What in the World are they Spraying” will be available, they say, with Greek subtitles, at the end of next week.
