If you can present me with ONE example of a prominent climate change sceptic agreeing with you that chemtrails are a reality, not a conspiracy theory, I will concede that your strategy may have some change of success.
This is another clever attempt to marginalize the truth.
Here are the flaws with this statement.
First, I am not a climate change skeptic.
I am a supporter of integrity in science, along with thousands of other scientists who agree that global warming is a scientific fraud.
There have been many scientific frauds in the past decades. Everything from fake drug studies to non-existent doctors to bribes that got Nutrasweet passed through FDA.
These frauds are being exposed. The people who believe that these frauds exist are not called "drug skeptics". They are simply people who demand integrity in science.
Quote
If you can present me with ONE example of a prominent climate change sceptic agreeing with you that chemtrails are a reality
You are again making a false associations here. This is a clever but horribly deceptive statement.
Most of the people you consider "prominent" are corrupt, so we should NOT depend on them to have integrity in this cause. This is how we got into this situation to begin with. I am highly-skeptical of anyone who asks us to depend on "prominent" people.
This is a grassroots movement. If only 3% of people become active in this fight (which will eventually be a reality), it can be overturned, but it does take effort, especially when 51% of the total U.S. budget is a secret secret military budget with no accountability.
Depending on corrupt people that you consider "prominent" is NOT the solution, but this is exactly what the opposition wants us to do.
Again, this is grassroots movement that will force governments into accountability from the bottom up, not the top down.
Quote
You insist that these two subjects are the same subject, but they clearly are not, because by your criteria the mainstream climate change deniers are being truthful on one subject and untruthful on the other.
This is a lie.
Geoengineering scientists and advocates ALIKE state OPENLY that THE REASON FOR GEOENGINEERING is to STOP CLIMATE CHANGE.
Geoengineering opponents completely agree. You seem to be the only one disagreeing here.
You can see evidence of this in many articles and in the video "What In the World are they Spraying?" directly from the mouths of (highly-paid and well-granted) climate change scientists:
Your claim that they are two different subjects is horribly deceptive and bogus to the core.
Quote
By contrast, I am utilizing the achievements of people with whom I share views on global warming
With the evidence that we now have that global warming is a scientific fraud, the only way a person can continue to promote this lie is:
(1) They are corrupt (paid disinformation - as many scientists and online-bloggers/forum infiltrators are), or
(2) They are willfully ignorant. If they continue to remain ignorant in light of the information that I have included in my recent posts, then they are "willfully ignorant", which means they are internally corrupt and are deceiving themselves.
What achievements are you speaking of?
You mean the fact that global warming alarmists are pressing forward with an enormous global system of taxation and global power grab?
Perhaps you mean the achievement that nations are losing their sovereignty and individual people are losing their rights in countries around the world due to the climate change hoax.
Maybe you're speaking of the achievements of countries being forced to adopt regulations that are oppressing workers and ruining small business?
Are these the achievements that you speak of?
Are these the achievements that cause you to want to trust "prominent" people and continue to promote a proven-false belief that global warming exists?
---
Several videos explaining the global warming fraud:
