I'm not trolling, and I'm not here to waste your and/or my own time. I want to secure support for the argument I have been putting forward.

But I agree that it is unlikely either you or I will introduce any new content and will probably, if we continue, merely keep going over the same ground.

The crucial point is that you are not challenging the people who share the same views as yourself on global warming but continue to tell lies about chemtrails.

You insist that these two subjects are the same subject, but they clearly are not, because by your criteria the mainstream climate change deniers are being truthful on one subject and untruthful on the other.

By contrast, I am utilizing the achievements of people with whom I share views on global warming in order to go further than they are able to go and demand why governments have signed a moratorium they are not observing.

This is a subject that can be raised in mainstream discourse, whereas you have not found any comparable way of moving from the climate debate to the chemtrails debate, in a way that you can take your mainstream climate change sceptics with you.

If you can present me with ONE example of a prominent climate change sceptic agreeing with you that chemtrails are a reality, not a conspiracy theory, I will concede that your strategy may have some change of success.

If you want to stop the argument here, OK. I don't want you to think that I am a troll or that I have a lot of time to waste.