The climate debate diverts about 99% of the population away from the chemtrails/geoengineering debate. It is a distraction from it.

And since Copenhagen a large number of climate sceptics are now joining the discussion as advocates of geoengineering.

To quote my article "Climate: are we having the right discussion"?

“It is strange that geoengineering is being promoted enthusiastically by a number of right-wing think tanks that are active in climate denialism. …Why would activists who deny warming is occurring and oppose measures to reduce emissions support the development of a technology aimed at countering global warming?”

(Clive Hamilton: The Return of Dr. Strangelove)



“A number of right-wing think tanks actively denying climate change are also promoting geoengineering, an irony that seems to escape them.”

(Clive Hamilton: An Evil Atmosphere is formed around Geoengineering)

"In the new post-Copenhagen conjuncture there is both more climate change skepticism and more public advocacy of geoengineering. That is on the face of it absurd, but a message that would be incoherent and incomprehensible if addressed to a single audience can retain an appearance of coherence if its two components are targeted at different audiences: the geoengineering advocacy at ecologists and leftists, the skepticism at conservatives. "

In other words a new bipolar game has been constructed by the same people who set up the original bipolar game with the Soviet Union and the nuclear arms race.

When the Soviet Union was defeated the Russian nuclear arsenal should have been dismantled. Who stopped it from being dismantled? The Russians?? Yeltsin in September 1991 was advocating 95% unilateral Russian nuclear disarmament in the Russian parliament.

Why should one help the New World Order creeps to set up new bipolar games?

Why should one get involved in the climate debate anyway?? In reaction to the ecologists? Why should one react to the ecologists?

Chemtrails activists who are ecologists have been bitterly critical of Greenpeace’s avoidance of chemtrails.

Why is there no parallel confrontation with the skeptics who cop out, who are DISHONEST, on the subject of chemtrails??

Not only should we forget the climate debate. We should focus one hundred percent on the geoengineering moratorium and DEMAND that our governments comply with it, particularly if they have signed it, which nearly all governments have.

This naturally leads the debate on to chemtrails, and so onto the more clandestine, black and criminal functions that are being served by chemtrails.

By contrast, if one lines up with the mainstream skeptics to win the climate debate, when these same skeptics do not recognize that geoengineering and chemtrails are a reality, all that one does is to prolong the bipolar dispute with the climate change true believers, without ever reaching the subject of chemtrails.

Chemtrails are kept out of the mainstream debate, consigned to a little private “conspiracy theory” smoking room.

If you tailend people like Ball, you will never get your chance to talk about chemtrails in “respectable company”.