There's nothing more I can add that I haven't already said.The truth is the truth.There is no global warming, period. This is the scientific position. The data previously believed to "prove" global warming is false, was fabricated, and is being used to justify geoengineering.
When we all finally accept the scientific position - that there is no such thing as global warming - then there is NO justification for geoenginering, period.
It's simple.
To concede to a lie is wrong and offers no benefit to the people of the world. None whatsoever.Since I have a few minutes, let me analyze your position.
You said...
Of course my view is that the divisiveness is - precisely - the agenda. Both sides are infiltrated by people pursuing this agenda. The violent "warmist" video to which the link was provided above, serves the agenda. People who have the simplistic view that "no global warming = no geoengineering" serve the agenda.
Let's start with this:
Of course my view is that the divisiveness is - precisely - the agenda.
Telling the truth is divisiveness?
Having scientific integrity is divisiveness?
I don't think so.
I think it's a good thing for people to become educated about scientific facts. People can get a thorough education about the facts directly from scientists (not from politicians) by watching the videos on this page:
http://orbisvitae.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=93&page=1Now, for those who have a hard time believing that scientists sometime fudge data, I recommend that they watch this video:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M001RBoth sides are infiltrated by people pursuing this agenda.
No, actually one side has a small number of corrupt scientists, some of which have resigned and offered public apologies.
The other side has no need to make concessions and has no apologizing-scientists because the scientific data supports their position and they have not lied about it.
I'll leave it up to you to guess which side is which.
The violent "warmist" video to which the link was provided above, serves the agenda.
Indeed, the video has an agenda. Fortunately, it backfired.
People who have the simplistic view that "no global warming = no geoengineering" serve the agenda.
Without scientific integrity, people get hurt and people die, and being that I have been hurt because of the scientific fraud that falsely claims that amalgam (mercury-based) dental fillings are safe, I know how important it is to have scientific integrity.
I suffered from the horrible symptoms of mercury poisoning for 20 years because the American Dental Association held the patents for the manufacture of dental amalgam and made about $50 million per year by licensing the manufacturing rights to this patented "technology" (putting the mega-toxin mercury in people's mouths) (per Dr. Huggins research).
The "science" supporting their position was fraudulent because they wanted to make a huge profit, and they did, at the expense of millions of innocent people who suffer with mercury symptoms, which includes over 130 common diseases and emotional conditions.
Well this time, Al Gore stood to make hundreds of millions from companies trading carbon credits that he had a personal interest in, but in this case, it backfired because the truth - the real science - has been upheld by faithful scientists who refuse to allow politics to corrupt science.
My thanks goes out to faithful scientists who value integrity. As a result of their work, many will be spared the draconian laws, regulations, and taxes that would have been imposed if the global warming hoax had been allowed to continue.
So yes, everyone has an agenda. The real question is:
Is the agenda based in truth, or is the agenda based in a self-profiting enterprise?
