Register Log In

Home Page Forums General Information Area Chemtrails General Discussion Washington Post Geoengineering Article

October
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30	31

Who's Online Now

1 members (Russ Tanner), 11,646 guests, and 138 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Support Our Forum

Popular Topics(Views)

311,353 High-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails. So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?

292,574 VIDEO The ALUMINIZATION of Our Soils! Understanding One of the Reasons for Chemtrails

282,764 U.N. urged to freeze climate geo-engineering projects

206,753 My Chemtrail Story

191,062 U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on "Civilian Population"

153,661 John Holdren, Scientific Advisor to the President of the United States

148,451 (video) An Honest Pilot Confesses Chemtrails "A Necessary Evil"

131,580 (video) Global Skywatch Exposes the Contrail Myth

120,950 Jet Turbofan Engine Fuel Flow Rates are Much Too Low To Create Condensation Trails

99,734 CHEMTRAILS CRIME WATCH - LIVE TRACKING TOOL HERE

Credits & Thanks!

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: Washington Post Geoengineering Article

Russ Tanner #2996 11/03/10 05:48 AM

Joined: Oct 2010

Posts: 116

E

enouranois Offline

Offline

Graduate Member

Why don't you engage with the arguments I have put forward here:

http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=2850#Post2850

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Washington Post Geoengineering Article	Russ Tanner	11/01/10 05:42 PM
Re: Washington Post Geoengineering Article	enouranois	11/03/10 05:48 AM
Re: Washington Post Geoengineering Article	Russ Tanner	11/03/10 06:45 AM

Hop To

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1