Link to this page using this short URL
http://urlbam.com/ha/M0059


Collection of Disinformation Articles and Pictures

Following is a growing collection of articles containing disinformation related to chemtrails (geoengineering).

Please beware that even your most beloved sources of news are likely to contain disinformation on a regular basis.

Thankfully, Americans are waking up to this fact which is evidenced by a recent poll that said (paraphrasing) 75% of American don't really trust the news anymore.


A Pivotal Bit of Information

In all of your researching on chemtrails and geoengineering, don't forget the most important thing. Geoengineering is the "solution" being offered to correct "global warming". But the fact is, there is NO global warming, so there is NO legitimate need for geoengineering.

When you hear geoengineering politicians/scientists talking about the "risk/benefit" ratio of spraying 20 to 30 million tons of aluminum into the atmosphere each year, remember that there is absolutely NO benefit to geoengineering because the problem they are claiming to try to solve DOES NOT EXIST.

To clearly understand what John Coleman (Meteorologist and found of The Weather Channel) calls, "The greatest scientific fraud in history", please take time to watch the videos on this page:

The Global Warming Hoax



Biofuels: a growing evil

Source: Telegraph
Date: Oct 27 2010
URL: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jeremywarner/100008365/biofuels-a-growing-evil/

NOTE: The article below shifts blame for "aircraft pollution" to biofuels and related fuel additives. This is the same EPA propaganda that is pushed by Jim Lee and his followers. Do not be fooled by them. The chemtrail program is not an incidental side-effect of fuel additives as Lee claims. It is an intentional operation distributing massive amounts of toxic metals into the atmosphere for the purpose of legitimizing global government. Learn more in these links:
How the EPA is Ensuring that Chemical Aerosol Injection Will Continue
What Is Happening In the World, Why, and What Comes Next - In 5 Minutes
The Final Threats That Will Be Used To Implement Global Government

The caption for the following picture in this article is refers to "Vapour trails", but they are not vapour trails. They are clearly chemtrails (chemical trails).

This is a prime example of "in plain sight" propaganda.





U.N. urged to freeze climate geo-engineering projects

Source: Yahoo New, Canada
Date: Oct 21 2010
URL: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/101021/science/science_us_geoengineering_1

A picture's worth a thousand words.

The editor who decided to place a small plane in the graphic next to this article (pictured below) knew what they were doing. Just imagine the association that would have been made in the public's mind if a real chemtrail jet was in the photo instead.

Think about this for a second.

Do you really think the entire planet can be geoengineered using small prop planes like the one shown in the article below?

Absolutely not.

In fact, it's openly admitted by geoengineering politicians/scientists that geoengineering requires hundreds of enormous jet tankers* traversing the globe.

This being the case, why did this article about geoengineering place a picture of a small prop plane next to the article?

Small prop planes are irrelevant to geoengineering, but using this picture won't alert (wake up) the public by making a mental connection between dangerous geoengineering and the big jets with enormous plumes they've been seeing in the sky for several years.

Think about it.

* "Tankers" are large air-to-air refueling aircraft - often 747's or 767's - used primarily by the Air Force.


Beware: The linked-to article looks like this:




But it should look like this:





Geoengineering sparks international ban, first-ever congressional report

Source: Washington Post
Date: Oct 29 2010
URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/29/AR2010102906365.html?hpid=topnews

This Washington Post article tells about the geoengineering ban, and even reveals that the U.S. has not ratified the prohibition.

Why is this article disinformation?

Because they fail to reveal the pivotal fact: That global warming is a scientific fraud.

Apparently, the media and the genengineering fraudsters are hoping that the public forgets climate gate and just allows them to continue with a new costly war against a non-existent enemy.

Listen to these quotes:

"The debate over whether humans should explore ways to manipulate the climate has taken on increased urgency over the past year, as efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming have encountered political roadblocks in the United States and elsewhere."

In this sentence, they fail to mention that greenhouse gas in the atmosphere (normally they are speaking about CO2 when they mention "greenhouse gasses") follow temperature changes, not lead them.

Here's another false assertion (propaganda):

While some scientists and environmentalists have called for geoengineering research as a precautionary measure against catastrophic global warming...

In this sentence, they shamelessly associate global warming with the word "catastrophic".

In the second-to-last sentence of the propaganda piece, they say this:

But Ken Caldeira, an environmental science professor at the Carnegie Institution's Department of Global Ecology who testified before Gordon's panel last year, said countries need to "undertake studies on what we might do" in a climate crisis, given the current trajectory of carbon concentrations in the atmosphere.

The current long-term trajectory of carbon in the atmosphere is down, but Caldiera craftily omits this vital piece of information.

Finally, this propaganda ends with this quote from Caldiera:

"Nobody likes the idea of engineering Earth's climate," Caldeira wrote in an e-mail. "Unfortunately, at some point, our other options may be even more unpleasant."

Again, nothing is really said here, but the implication is simple fear mongering.

Remember, the core of the "geoengineering" scam is that they want to create another scary enemy (global warming) so they can scare you into allowing your government to funnel billions of your tax dollars through government contractors that they own, thus profiting them billions.

Remember, global warming is a scientific fraud.



Why the United Nations (UN) climate change talks are now largely irrelevant

Source: Telegraph (UK)
Date: Nov 03 2010
URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/81...ge-talks-are-now-largely-irrelevant.html



The Telegraph does it again.

Short sentence fragments within this article contain blatantly false propagandic statements. This is the first sentence of the article:

"The panel of experts concluded that the UN talks will not force countries to reduce emissions, the only way to stop run away global warming."

In this piece of propaganda, "implication" is used.

"Implication" is a propagandic methodology that uses false implicative statements to convey false beliefs to the reader. Such statements are usually tucked away in the "less-important" parts of a sentence. This makes them feel less emotionally-threatening and are therefore more likely to be thoughtlessly-accepted as truth by the reader.

This first sentence is also utilizing "repetition".

"Repetition" is another propagandic methodology that repeats words, phrases, and concepts over and over until the reader begins to accept them as truth. This technique is also usually executed in "less-important" parts of a sentence.

This technique has been utilized extensively when newscasters or writers refer to 9/11. They say something like, "... on 9-11 - the day terrorist flew planes into the world trade center."

In this statement, they use this less-important (and therefore less threatening) part of a sentence to reiterate the concept that associates "terrorists" to "the world trade center". This propagandic association helps to displace and discredit the government's involvement in 9-11 on a subconscious level.

Why is this article disinformation?

Because the article make the blatantly false implication that global warming is in a "run-away" condition.

Although it's not highlighted in the graphic above, the subtitle of this article says, "Will the UN climate talks save the planet...". Of course this clearly falsely implies that the planet actually needs saving.

Regardless of how saturated the media becomes with climate change fear mongering, the fact remains: Global warming is a scientific fraud.

Clearly, genengineering profiteers - with the help of mainstream media - are working hard to make the public forget climate gate: The massive scientific fraud that revealed volumes of fabricated temperature data that was used to swindle national leaders into believing in global warming.