My personal concern (I don't represent all chemtrail activists) about what you said about HOME is this:

The truth always becomes known eventually.

We know that:

(1) Global warming is a scientific fraud,

(2) Global warming is the "problem" being used to justify geoengineering.

(3) Geoengineering (actually a misnomer because it's not geoengineering at all, it's population control) is not isolated, it is global.

Considering these facts, there is no acceptable form of geoengineering. Those who lied about global warming are international criminals involved in a massive scientific conspiracy. They should be prosecuted.

The truth is what activists should be supporting; they should not be making concessions.

Organizations should not be considered as viable by chemtrial activists because they have some degree of existing credibility (especially when that credibility is based on false information). Organizations should be considered viable if they are accurate and have integrity (are telling the truth).

Supporting an organization (HOME) that (according to you) recognizes scientific frauds (global warming) and half truths (limited geoengineering) may seem like a good short-term solution, but in truth, the only long-term solution is to support an organization that is accurate and has integrity.

There is a methodology called the Hegelian dialectic that is used to control public opinion through a process of incorporating opposing viewpoints. Making concessions regarding truth is the only way this method of public control will work.

So, in short, we should make no concessions.

This must be a grassroots movement, and in order for it to be successful, more people need to be involved.


It's like saying that contrails are common. Once people make this concession, then they have opened the door to accepting chemtrails without opposition. Why? Because most new chemtrails look like "contrails".


The first question that I have is: "Is HOME part of a Hegelian dialectic operation?"

If not, then great. If they are just uninformed, then perhaps they would be open to being corrected.

Nevertheless, chemtrail activists should be willing to accept and promote nothing less than accurate truth. Otherwise, they will be creating the very bases for their own discrediting that the opposition are looking for.