"The 2014 strain of Ebola has a death rate of 50-60% but try to imagine what would happen if there is a pandemic of Ebola with hundreds of thousands or millions infected with the virus. So far the few cases of Ebola-infected people have "enjoyed" intensive healthcare with anti-viral and breathing assistance but above all with abundant human support by Physicians and nurses. In a pandemic scenario that kind of healthcare won't be available for the overwhelming number of infected leading to a dramatic increase of the death rate due to the lack of proper healthcare. The "quality" factor is that the death rate could increase to 80-90% in a pandemic scenario from the stated 50-60% rate. The figure itself is not important what is relevant is the fact that the scenario can evolve beyond the initial conditions from a 50% death toll to more than 90%. By the way, no pandemic or nuclear war is included in the forecast."
Source: Look to the post above

If you look to this scenario from this point of view. It is not that far off. Although Ebola is not really a threat there might be other aspects of the health issue which might be really true. Ebola could spread out because of the widespread custom in Africa of washing the dead. This is not a threat anymore as the populace was educated about it.

But there might be another truth behind this example. Antibiotics for every bacterial disease are running out. There are already bacterial diseases which can not be healed by antibiotics. Viral disease are anyways always a problem. To many health officials these kind of diseases are the main concern because of their unpredictability.

Also there is another threat which is not publicly discussed: the financial market. Deagel is right about the demography. There are financial promises which are unrealistically. In reality, there are burdens to get rid off. If you get rid of a part of the population you will have less burdens. Therefore there are hidden costs in the public budgets which are getting under the pressure of the financial markets. This is finally a health issue.

Of course, in total deagel.com has a pessimistic view of the world. Deagel saves itself by saying the development depends on the technological development - as Karl Marx did with his "tendencial fall of the profit rate", too. The whole website is cleverly made and serves the latent mistrust of the populace towards their governments.
The pessimistic view of the author(s?) of the website is stating that every year since 2007 is getting worse. Therefore, the source of the pessimistic view is the financial crisis of 2007. In fact, this crisis was a "cold turkey" from the derivatives. But as it is normally usual with addicts to stay healthy they have to stay abstinent from drugs. As the system has not really been changing since 2007 this pessimistic view has its justification. If things will develop that bad as Deagel predicts is open.


"Take into account that the forecast is nothing more than a model whether flawed or correct. It is not God's word or a magic device that allows to foresee the future." (Deagel, Source above)

Last edited by Denglisch; 09/07/18 11:58 AM.