CNN says the only “affordable” way of stopping “global warming” is depopulating the plan Read more at https://web.archive.org/web/20131017163006/http://investmentwatchblog.com/cnn-says-the-only-affordable-way-of-stopping-global-warming-is-depopulating-the-plan/#h7ZxiZkUM37y2lek.99 longlink.com
Alan Weisman; Adam Grupper; Hachette Audio (Firm); Recorded Books, LLC. Countdown : our last, best hope for a future on Earth? New York : Hachette Audio ; Prince Frederick, MD : Distributed by Recorded Books, 2013. http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/864355376
"Or that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change now says that if we want to stay below a 2-degree Celsius (3.6-degree Fahrenheit) increase in average global temperature, we can't emit any more carbon dioxide than what's released by burning 1 trillion tons of carbon. But we've already used more than half our allotment." https://web.archive.org/web/20131104115114/http://littlebrown.com/countdown.html longlink.com
As we know already: There were 280 ppm CO² in the earth atmosphere in pre-industrial times. CO² has a climate sensitivity of 3° Celsius in total. This CO² climate sensitivity is logarythmic structured with 1,5° Celsius for the first 20 ppm CO². There WAS already a 1,5° Celsius temperature rise in the atomsphere of earth for the first 20 ppm CO² - a long time ago.
If there was already this temperature rise because of CO² in the past there is no temperature rise because of CO² threatening civilization in the future!
So: Why don't we need another billion people? Because of singularity?
