Quick Comebacks

Following is a growing collection of responses and rebuttals that I often use against debunkers on YouTube and other networks that have limited reply space.

These are actual rebuttals that I have used. Please feel free to use them yourself.


"Scientific Evidence" Argements

Those who are too afraid ("paranoid") to admit that chemtrails exist (ironically, they often accuse others of being "paranoid") are certainly in deep denial about the existence of chemtrails. They often like to claim that there is no scientific evidence supporting chemtrails.


Comment:

Not a single bit of scientific evidence has ever been presented that suggests chemtrails exist.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRxN6vU5juE

Rebuttal:

Science is a process of observation.

We can all see? chemtrails. Many with sensitive senses, including myself can taste the salty-metallic-chemical taste in the air when their appear.

These are observations and are therefore, by definition, scientific.

Chemtrails also cause a myriad of symptoms in myself and others that are identical to mercury and barium poisoning.

I understand that this is scary, nevertheless, we must use our intellect to think, not paranoia and denial mechanisms.


Comment:

If you're trying to make yourself look like something? that crawled out from under a rock, you've done a great job.

Calling people names only makes YOU look like dirt.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRxN6vU5juE

Rebuttal:

This unprecedented activity covers the sky daily in many areas. Plumes spread out and have (locally) set a record as the "dimmest" in recorded history.

We have documented this, observed all related patterns, and taken extensive timelapse.

Sensitive people are able to sense a salty-metallic taste to the air when this occurs.

I know human nature well enough to know that people feel safe in numbers. They are too fearful to admit seeing "unusual" things, even when observed.