Motorola forbids resonance for non-ionizing radiation: Claim of no Influence on the body chemistry --> therefore no accountability for artificial non-ionizing radiation by the cell phone industry.
Insurance companies tell something different.
Minute: 57 Second: 26 follow the words of Jerry L. Phillips, PhD, chemist about the role of Motorola during the scientific cognitive process about the connection between non-ionizing radiation - which according the industry's propaganda scheme is supposed to have no physical impact on chemical bounds - and the stability of DNA
J.L. Phillips, N.P. Singh, H. Lai Electromagnetic fields and DNA damage Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):79-88 http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/488911461 http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(09)00014-5/fulltext http://www.pathophysiologyjournal.com/article/S0928-4680(09)00014-5/pdf
