Debunking Contrail Propaganda

Propaganda is sometimes clever, but often ridiculous. Fortunately, it only takes a little logic and critical thinking to see through most propaganda.

The Contrail Claim

Propagandists claim that jet trails are simply moisture from burnt jet fuel that freezes and becomes visible in the cold atmosphere. But this claim contains fundamental contradictions.



The Big Question

If water from jet engines becomes visible at freezing temperatures at 30,000 feet, why doesn't the same thing happen at ground level?

The Answer

It's a good question, and the answer is simple:

The same thing does occur at freezing temperatures at ground level.

For example, at freezing temperatures, you can throw hot water into the air. It will flash-freeze forming a visible "mist" in the air.



Likewise, when you exhale, the water vapor in your breath condenses and evaporates forming a visible mist in the air. Human breath is saturated with so much water, that exhaling on glass produces visible water on the glass at any temperature.



The Contradiction

Here's where the fundamental contradiction occurs.

At ground level, jet engines do not form a visible frozen mist at freezing temperatures.

Why not? If they emit enough water vapor to create enormous plumes at altitude, what is so different at ground level?

The answer is simple:

If jet engines emitted large amounts of water, they would certainly produce enormous condensation plumes on the ground as well as in the air in cold temperatures. So why don't they produce these plumes on the ground? Because they simply do not emit enough water vapor.

Jet fuel is primarily kerosene. When you burn kerosene, the primary result is carbon soot. This is true of nearly all hydrocarbon fuels.



When you burn kerosene in freezing air, you do not see plumes of frozen water vapor. Instead, you see faint black plumes of carbon soot.

When you watch jets take off in freezing temperatures, you also do not see plumes of frozen water. You only see faint, dark plumes of carbon soot, and this is exactly what we expect.

Throughout history, jets flying in freezing temperatures at 30,000 feet produce faint, black trails of carbon soot. Again, exactly what we expect to see.

The next logical question is:

Since jet engines do not emit enough water to produce a visible trail at freezing temperatures, then why do we see jet trails in the sky?

The Jet Trail Explosion

Despite the fact that high-bypass turbofans have been widely used since the 1960's, there have been no jet trails until the past 20 years. Jet trails are a new phenomenon. Historically they do not exist, the only exception being rare, obsolete water-injection engines (Spey 512). Such engines are no longer in production and are rarely used today.

Between 1995 and 2005 something unprecedented happened: Jet trails suddenly appeared throughout the United States and the rest of the world; city by city.



In my area, jet trails suddenly appeared overnight. One day we had no trails, the next day the sky was filled with plume after plume. This pattern continued every day at the same time from that day on. Previous to this, we never saw jets in the sky because our town only has a very small airport which is not capable of handling large jets.

These large, very-low-flying jets saturated the sky with trails. After 2 hours, these trails had spread out and created a completely overcast condition. This happened every day at the same time. The most amazing aspect of this daily sky-covering event is that most of the public simply ignored it.



It's important to note that history is being changed. Old newspaper clips and even movies are having jet trails inserted into the skies to cause the public to believe that jet trails have always existed. Those of us who are old enough to remember are emphatically alerting the world we are being lied to. Clearly, a massive, historic, internationally-coordinated propaganda program is underway to convince the world that jet trails are normal and have always existed.

See Changing History To Convince the World Contrails are Common

What Changed?

Since we know that normal jet engines do not produce jet trails, what changed in the past 20 years?

The only logical explanation is that something is being pumped into the fuel or injected into the bypass air stream of the engines, and we have overwhelming evidence that this is precisely what is happening.

See Solid Evidence of Intentional Atmospheric Aerosol Releases

See Thousands Smell and Taste Chemtrails



We are left with no other conclusion: Jet trails are intentionally created. Logic dictates that the recent government efforts to normalize these trails in the public eye are nothing more than a historic propaganda program, and again, all evidence points to this being the case.

See The Deliberate Intent To Deceive People Is At An All Time High

The Missing Water

One other point worth noting.

The amount of water required to produce plumes hundreds of feet wide is enormous. Hundreds of gallons of water would be required to produce these structures which are often wider than a football field and too opaque to see through.



If high-bypass turbofans emit so much water, why are airports not sopping wet? Even a few jets taking off with their engines working near capacity would drench airport runways.

Again, the truth is simple and logical. These engines simply do not emit enough water to create any visible wetness on airport runways.

Where Do They Store It?

Some have asked: Where is all the powdered aerosol stored? How can a jet carry enough to create such enormous trails?

Metallic nanoparticles have a very large surface area in ratio to their combined volume. Therefore, the volume of reflective metallic nanoparticles required to create an enormous opaque trail is tiny compared with water. This fact enables jets to easily transport sufficient quantities of small-particle aerosols to produce massive chemical-aerosol trails. This fact alone is a very strong argument against jet trails being "contrails" as synchronously claimed by globalist-owned mainstream media.

Common smoke machines can easily saturate a small theater with only cups of fluid. This works because the fluid creates very small particles and is opaque when heated.

The vast majority of jets reportedly leaving trails are military. This is easily verified with online services such as FlightRadar24.com. Furthermore, the airframe types producing trails are only types known to be used as military tankers. These tankers are capable of hauling enormous payloads. For example the KC-10 (a modified DC-10) can carry 170,000 pounds (76,560 kilograms) of payload and more than 356,000 pounds (160,200 kilograms) of fuel.

Finally, it must also be considered that suspended metal particulates are more opaque than steam, again making the "contrail" argument more improbable.

Other Artifacts and Evidence

There is simply so much hard evidence that aerosols are being intentionally released into the atmosphere that it can become overwhelming to the casual observer.

We see trails stop and start. We see no trails at ground level even during freezing temperatures. We have rain water tests indicating toxic amounts of the very same metals being used to produce the aerosols.

This article outlines many of the evidences proving an ongoing aerosol-injection program:
Hard Evidence of Intentional Atmospheric Aerosol Releases


You can share this image on Facebook (and other social media) using this link:


Related

Thousands Smell and Taste Chemtrails

Particulate Descent Time

Chemtrail Spray Scheduling

Jet Trail Bifurcation: Definitive Evidence of Intentional Aerosol Injection via Bypass Air

High-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails. So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?

How The World Really Works 2: The Final Countdown: Interview with the maker of the above video.

The Great Contrail Con

Plumes Change Overnight

Council on Foreign Relations Says Millions Spent To Confuse the Public About Geoengineering

COINTELPRO: Keeping Americans in the Dark

Forum About Disinformation

Chemtrails in Kid's Library Books