Why We Choose To Use The Terms "Aerosol Injection" and "Chemtrails"
Please note that we don't condemn those who choose to use the term "geoengineering", but we believe it's time to use terms that more accurately reflect the nature of the spraying, and this article explains why.
Occasionally, people ask why we use the terms "Aerosol Injection" and "Chemtrails" instead of "geoengineering". The word "chemtrails" has been associated by globalist-media with "conspiracy theories", so some believe it may not be helpful. This article explains why we have continued to use this word.
Representative Andy Biggs, Chairman of the Joint Environmental Subcommittee and Energy Subcommittee hearing on geoengineering publicly defined geoengineering. He said:
"Geoengineering is the concept of using scientific understanding to alter the atmosphere in a way that produces positive outcomes and results."
Notice the phrase, "produces positives outcomes and results" as this is a key phrase that we'll cover shortly.
Start listening at 3m 26s into this video:
Chemtrails: A popular, general term identifying a visible phenomenon. This term clearly conveys the true, toxic nature of the aerosols being released into the atmosphere.
Aerosol Injection: The process that produces the visible phenomenon commonly called "chemtrails". This also accurately conveys the consequence of the process because all scientists know that increased atmospheric aerosols induce disease and shorten lifespans.
Geoengineering: A process which implies a beneficent (beneficial) purpose for a visible phenomenon. This term is directly related to a belief in global warming because GW was created—and is being used—to justify the need for "geoengineering". Is the process really benevolent? Is the process of spraying highly-toxic metals/chemical above the public really helping the public? No, yet, this is exactly what it implies! Should we acquiesce to using a term used and promoted by the establishment? Should we use this term when the establishment uses it to color the spraying as beneficial process? The answer should be blatantly obvious.
Aircraft Emissions: This term normalizes jet trails implying they come from "normal" commercial aircraft. This term is used to downplay jet trails and tricks the public into believing jet trails are an unintended side-effect of poor regulation of commercial jet fuel additives, but nothing could be further from the truth. This term is promoted by governments to confuse the public and convolute the issue. It is the term pushed by the EPA's new propaganda campaign to normalize chemtrails in the eyes of a younger, less-experienced generation.
Using the term "geoengineering" implies that the purpose of the spraying is to geoengineer (change) the Earth, which—in modern contexts—suggests a beneficial purpose. The true purpose of spraying toxic chemicals and releasing poisonous metals into Earth's atmosphere is far from beneficial, and far be it from us to succumb to mainstream semantic games.
The ongoing spraying campaign is insidious and destructive. Therefore, we believe it should not be associated with any positive term, such as "engineering". We normally use the phrases "aerosol injection" and "chemtrails" for most new articles we produce, but understand this, the term "chemtrails" is not going to win or lose any new converts to truth. In order to help the public understand this subject, we must first understand human nature.
Whether or not people believe spraying is occurring is based on a persons level of emotional egocentrism. People—including academics—who are inclined to please themselves emotionally (remain in their emotional comfort zone) by rejecting evidence that opposes their chosen world view are violating a fundamental rule of science: Dispassion. Such egocentric persons are going to reject the truth our cause brings to the table regardless of the terminology we choose to use.
(Emotional comfort largely involves avoiding rejection by peers. This fear of rejection causes many to follow the perceived belief of the community. Mainstream media has much sway over the public because it controls the perception of community belief. The emotional fear of rejection by peers that keeps one's beliefs from moving beyond the beliefs of their peers is called "social pressure". Until one rises above the fear invoked by social pressure, they remain controlled by those who control public perception, which is, mainstream media. People gripped by social pressure induced fear remain unable to lead or significantly affect their peers. This is the state in which the power brokers desire to keep the common population.)
This is an issue of human nature. You don't win the battle for truth by attracting people through pleasing semantics. You win the battle by persistent, logical appeal to scholars and a public segment who care more about truth than their own personal comfort. Such are the only true scholars and truth-seekers. A change in general public sentiment will follow.
The presiding principle is this:
Those who wish to know truth will learn through strength-of-will and personal humility. They must exert the strength-of-will to place truth above themselves. They must posses the humility to admit their previous world view is wrong or incomplete. When the public witnesses leaders—whether they be academic of social—refining their character, then, over time, they will follow and become willing to accept hard truths themselves.
Names and labels are largely irrelevant in the long term except to the extent that they can be remembered by the public. "Chemtrails" is a term that clearly identifies and relates to the subject we expose. It imposes no other meaning than its chemical consistency and trail-like formation, things we know to be accurate and true. The term is memorable.
On the contrary, it is counter-productive to use a term to describe the spraying as "geoengineering" because this term suggests the activity provides some human benefit.
We will do much better to use a term that is descriptive, popular, and is easy to remember.
We will do better to use a term that may be shocking and revealing so long as it is true and accurate. The concept of a "chemical trail" intentionally emitted from jets does both effectively: It conveys truth while conveying the horror of the toxic mix being sprayed on us.
We will also do better when we focus on those who are more interested in truth than personal comfort.
