Propagandists Keep Using the Same Media to "Prove" the Contrail Lie

UPDATE: A private whistle blower has revealed that he was part of an operation that was painting military jets to look like commercial jets. More on this in an upcoming article.

Just a few years ago, government-paid propagandists rehashed the same 10 pictures (the only 10 that exist according to our research) of world-war II prop-engine planes in an effort to "prove" to the world that all the lines we see in the sky today are "harmless contrails". When the online community exposed these images as likely frauds and as being completely inapplicable to modern turbofan engines, the propaganists stopped using those pictures and began using new tactics to push their false-contrail lie.





Today, the same 10 treasonous propagandists who have been at it for years are posting the same jet takeoff video over and over. This video features a Russian Ru-204 jet in cold conditions leaving huge trails behind it. As usual, we found numerous issues with the video that render it a likely fraud.

First, the jet engines appear to be non-standard. The engines do not sound anything like conventional commercial turbofans. Instead, they sound like military turbines used on jets such mammoths as the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy. Compare the sound of any typical commercial jet with the screaming, winding growl of the Galaxy. They are nothing alike. The engines in the controversial Tu-204 video sound nearly identical to the U.S. military's Galaxy indicating that the "commercial cargo" plane is using a military engine.

Second, the landscape around the runway appears to be vacant with some structures in the distance. Simply stated: This does not appear to be a commercial airport. The landscape and painted structures in the distance indicate a military installation. If this is the case, we must ask ourselves: Why is a jet that sounds like a military jet taking of from a facility that appears to be a military facility yet is painted to look like a commercial jet? It's known that the U.S. military has historically painted military jets to appear as commercial jets for the purpose of propaganda.

Third, considering the fact that thousands of jets take off in cold weather daily around the world, why are photos of jets producing trails during takeoff so extremely rare? Governments spend enormous sums to produce propaganda which is used against its own public, and this has continued for many decades. Is there any reason to believe this behavior will suddenly cease when they are involved in activity that is harmful to all life? It's more than reasonable to suspect that such historic crimes against humanity - such as global aerosol injection - will be buffered with historic propaganda.

Below is the video being rehashed by the same, known propagandists to "prove" that "contrails" exist and are common. The video title labels the jet a Russian Tu-204. The paint on the jet makes it appear to be a commercial cargo jet.

We've also included a video showing an Airbus A-380 being cold-weather tested in Iqaluit, Nunavut, (northern) Canada in February 2007. Despite very cold temperatures, we don't see any contrails in this video. We also don't see contrails in any of the thousands of other cold-weather takeoffs on the internet. Instead, we see exactly what we see at every airport: Carbon soot being emitted from the engines. Note the dramatic difference in sound between commercial turbofans as opposed to military turbofans.

The Propagandic "Contrail" Proof Video

Below is the video being posted again and again by the same 10 propagandists. They use this video to "prove" that contrails exist and are common despite the glaring discrepancies in this video, which are clearly outlined above. We believe this video is likely a propaganda stunt that "surfaced" in sync with the global aerosol injection program, and is now being used to convince the world that the lines we see in the sky are "harmless contrails".




Lockheed C-5 Galaxy

Compare the sound of the Lockheed C-5 Galaxy in these videos with the Russian TU-204 above. The engines on the TU-204 clearly sound nothing like commercial turbines but rather military turbines.






Airbus A-380 Being Cold-Weather Tested

Below is an enormous Airbus A-380 being cold-weather tested in Iqaluit, Nunavut, (northern) Canada under very cold conditions. Notice that we see only carbon soot coming from the engines, as we should expect. No condensation forms despite very cold conditions. Also notice how much smoother the engines sound as compared to military turbofans in the above videos.




Related Links

High-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails.

Definitive Evidence of Intentional Aerosol Injection via Bypass Air

The ALUMINIZATION of Our Soils

Chemtrail "Dark Dust" Kills Computers

Rainwater, Dust, & Soil Test Results

New NASA Disinformation: Cloud Chart for Schoolchildren

CFR Meeting Says Millions Spent to Confuse Public About the Need for Geoengineering

Geoengineering Nano-Particle Halos

Sudden Oak Death Syndrome Being Used to Implement Agenda 21