Ermano Giorgi from L'Aquila refers as vice-president of the local parliamentary chamber of the community L'Aquila to an agreement between the NATO and Italy which would cost - according to Ermano Giorgi - 22 Million Euro daily only for Italy.
In an effort of research the website
http://blauerhimmel.info/?page_id=730 tries to clarify what agreement specifically was meant by Ermano Giorgi it links the statement of Ermano Giorgi to the following paraphrase:
"The second 'U.S. Italy Joint Meeting on Climate Change – Science and Technology” was convened on June 16 under the 2001 bilateral agreement on climate change research and low carbon technologies."
https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/oes/rls/or/22042.htmThat way the cited agreement by Ermano Giorgi would be a bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Italy.
As Ermano Giorgi says the agreement is an agreement between NATO and Italy.
Therefore it's necessary to look into the NATO website.
As Jens Stoltenberg tells us:
"(...)On the 12th of September, 2001, the day after those horrific attacks on this nation, national security advisor Condoleezza Rice received a phone call from the U.S. Ambassador to NATO, from Nick. He told her that every NATO ally stood as one with America and that every ally was willing to defend America. On that moment, Rice would later write, 'It is really good to have friends'. In its NATO allies, America has the best of friends and it always will. So, my message is that NATO is good for Europe but it’s also good for the United States and that’s the reason why we are so proud of the Transatlantic Bond. Thank you. (...)"
http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_135317.htm?selectedLocale=enI see more a connection to 9/11 as a "legitimate cause" for the establishment of permanent military airspace measurements (Cohn-Bendit:
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=17987#Post17987 ) than a bilateral agreement between Italy and the United States as suggested by blauer himmel. (Different opinion:
http://www.corriere.it/cronache/16_...de9390-aeff-11e6-8815-37f3520714e8.shtml )
The political party DIE LINKE in Germany gives a clue with its small inquiry december 17th 2013 in the Parliament Bundestag:
http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/002/1800202.pdfIt looks like NATO is still active according Article 5 of the NATO Treaty.
It's like the Manhattan Project which is also still active.
