|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 members (),
3,617
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 13,370
Founder Master Elite Member
|
In Wyoming It's Now Illegal To Collect Data About Pollution
This is certainly the next logical step. Now that people all over the world are finding aluminum, barium, and other toxic metals in the environment that contribute to the huge body of evidence of chemical aerosol spraying, the government's response is to make this type of data collection illegal, even when the data is gathered for the purpose of turning it over the government.
The new law—as written—prevents data collection without the consent of the property owner, but it's just a matter of time before a court extends this definition to include United States Government lands, in other words, public lands.
So the final outcome of this law once matured in the court system will be thus:
You can only conduct contamination tests on your own land, but when you do, you risk having your land condemned and therefore risk being forced off your own property "for your own protection", or at the very least, having to disclose this contamination when you sell your house thereby making your land unsellable. This will effectively shut down any useful environmental testing and will allow ongoing chemical aerosol spraying continue unchallenged, and this, of course, is the real reason for legislation taking this bizarre, restrictive turn.
Don't you think the government wants us to know if there is anything harmful on the land?
No, not when they're committing the largest and most toxic chemical/metal spray campaign in human history.
Last edited by admin; 02/02/16 09:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
Master Elite Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|