Ausbringungsmöglichkeiten

Neben den Studien von CSEPP (1992) und Robock et al. (2009), ist insbesondere die aktuelle Studie von McClellan et al. (2010) hervorzuheben. Für die Ausbringung mit Flugsystemen wird angenommen, dass das Material mit einer Rate von 0,03 kg/m freigesetzt wird. Es werden Ausbringungshöhen von 13 bis 30 km untersucht.
http://www.weather-modification-journal.de/chemtrails-ägypten/

English:
"Dispersal options

In addition to the studies of CSEPP (1992) and Robock et al. ( 2009) , in particular the recent study by McClellan et al . ( 2010) emphasized . For the application with aircraft systems , it is assumed that the material at a rate of 0.03 kg / m is released. There are examined spreading heights 13-30 km away."


Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP) (1992):
http://orise.orau.gov/national-security-emergency-management/capabilities/training/csepp.aspx
"Warning messages transmitted to populations at risk from an accidental release of chemical agent must be carefully designed to maximize appropriate responses from affected publics. This guide develops an approach for preparing Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) messages for the Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP). Sample messages illustrate the application of this approach. While the sample messages do not cover every emergency situation, the texts are generic in that accident and location specific factors can be incorporated into the final message developed by local emergency planners. Thus they provide a starting point, not an end product, for emergency planners."
Vogt, B.M., Sorensen, J.H.; Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory.; United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information.
Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ; Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 1992.
http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/727237523


Robock A, Marquardt AB, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G. 2009. The benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letter 36: L19703, DOI: 10.1029/2009GL039209.
CrossRef,Web of Science® Times Cited: 10,ADS
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2009GL039209/full

Justin McClellan
James Sisco, Brandon Suarez, Greg Keogh
Geoengineering Cost Analysis
The University Of Calgary July 27, 2011
http://justinmcclellan.com/GeoengineeringReport.pdf
https://r3zn8d.files.wordpress.com/2011/12/aurorageoreport1.pdf