[quote=Denglisch]"By Puneet Kollipara January 22
( https://twitter.com/pkollipara , Denglisch)
(...)
Unfortunately, Cairns suggests, the potential for the geoengineering research community to publicly engage with chemtrails activists “appears limited” — they may simply not be receptive. As she argues, chemtrails believers’ longtime distrust of the alleged conspirators has reached outright disgust — to the point where unbelievers are labeled as paid liars (or even “mentally retarded,” as she quotes one chemtrails activist).

A very tiny subset of the chemtrails activists could have a more chilling effect on the field of geoengineering, Keith worries. He notes that he continually receives nasty emails and voice messages from chemtrails believers, and he has even received multiple threats of violence that have prompted him to contact the police.

In short, chemtrails itself is a conspiracy theory. But the environmental and political concerns underlying the theory can’t be ignored, as they certainly would arise in any mainstream debate over whether to proceed with geoengineering. And chemtrails believers themselves could become a thorn in geoengineering researchers’ and proponents’ sides for many years to come."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...d-derail-the-debate-over-climate-policy/

Well, where is the cloud chamber to prove the alegations made?
http://www.neuschnee.co.at
http://web.archive.org/web/20080630234206/http://njsas.org/projects/atoms/cloud_chamber/index.php
http://bitcast-a.v1.fra1.bitgravity.com/theri/vid_222/222_640.mp4
http://www.phywe.com/461/pid/3051/Grossraum-Diffusions-Nebelkammer-80*80-cm,-PJ-80,-230-V-.htm

Instead, the alleged "emotions" on the side of the already ongoing Geoengineering convinced ones are used to prevent a debate which are supposed to be able to be led only by believed "academics" who are not in the position to make real science.