aCloudQuest Pty. Ltd., Nelspruit, South Africa cDepartment of Agrometeorology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
"Mather, G.K., M.J. Dixon, and J.M. De Jager, 1996: Assessing the potential for rain augmentation --- The Nelspruit randomized convective cloud seeding experiment. J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 1465-1482.
Abstract The experimental design, analyses, and results of the first Nelspruit randomized cloud seeding experiment are described. The experiment ran for three years, commencing in October 1984, and involved the on-top seeding of new cloud turrets growing on the flanks of isolated multicellular storms using dry ice delivered from a Learjet at around the height of the −10°C isotherm. All storms were tracked by a radar operating in computer-controlled volume scan mode. A total of 169 storms were examined, of which 94 passed the selection criteria. The most important criterion was based upon a microphysical classification scheme obtained from measurements made by the instrumented Learjet. This scheme, based upon a ratio of cloud-base temperature to potential buoyancy at 500 mb, rejected those storms in which the production of precipitation via coalescence was unlikely.
A key element of the experiment was the ability to objectively track the storms using an automatic storm tracking algorithm. Storms were analyzed in terms of their track properties, some of the more important of which were storm volume, area, and rain flux. Analyses of these track properties in 10-min time intervals either side of decision time (the time the seed/no-seed decision was made) proved to be the most revealing in terms of observed changes and rates of changes in convective cloud processes. This analysis showed an almost fourfold percentage increase in radar-measured rain flux and storm area when the seeded and control storms were compared.
A confirmatory experiment was conducted in the third season. Storm track properties that showed an apparent response to seeding in each of the first two seasons were selected prior the commencement of the third season. All but one of these track properties either stayed the same or showed increases in the third season, confirming the hypothesis that there were radar-detected differences between the seeded and control storms.
Received: March 18, 1994; Final Form: June 27, 1995
Cited by
S. V. Shevkunov. (2014) Water vapor clustering in the field of a chlorine anion occurring in a planar nanopore with structureless walls. Colloid Journal 76, 490-508. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2014. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2013) Domain nucleation in the contact layer at an interface of water and a polarizable substrate. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A 87:10, 1654-1661. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2013) Water vapor nucleation on a crystal surface in a strong electric field. Colloid Journal 75:4, 444-459. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2012) Collective interactions in the mechanism of adhesion of condensed phase nuclei to a crystal surface. 1. Spatial organization. Colloid Journal 74:5, 589-607. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2012. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2008) Stimulation of vapor nucleation on perfect and imperfect hexagonal lattice surfaces. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 107:6, 965-983. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. CrossRef Y. Segal, M. Pinsky, A. Khain. (2007) The role of competition effect in the raindrop formation. Atmospheric Research 83:1, 106-118. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2006) Water vapor nucleation on an infinite substrate with complementary structure: 1. The mechanism of nucleation. Colloid Journal 68:3, 357-369. Online publication date: 1-May-2006. CrossRef Thomas P. DeFelice, Conrad G. Keyes. 2013. Executive Summary. Guidelines for Cloud Seeding to Augment Precipitation, 1-8. CrossRef S. V. Shevkunov. (2005) Computer Simulation of the Initial Stage of Water Vapor Nucleation on a Silver Iodide Crystal Surface: 1. Microstructure. Colloid Journal 67:4, 497-508. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005. CrossRef A. Khain, V. Arkhipov, M. Pinsky, Y. Feldman, Ya Ryabov. (2010) Rain Enhancement and Fog Elimination by Seeding with Charged Droplets. Part I: Theory and Numerical Simulations. Journal of Applied Meteorology 43:10, 1513-1529. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2004. Abstract . Full Text . PDF (923 KB) A. de la Torre, V. Daniel, R. Tailleux, H. Teitelbaum. (2010) A Deep Convection Event above the Tunuyán Valley near the Andes Mountains. Monthly Weather Review 132:9, 2259-2268. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2004. Abstract . Full Text . PDF (852 KB) Y Segal, A Khain, M Pinsky, D Rosenfeld. (2004) Effects of hygroscopic seeding on raindrop formation as seen from simulations using a 2000-bin spectral cloud parcel model. Atmospheric Research 71:1-2, 3-34. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004. CrossRef Terrence W Krauss, Jorge Ruben Santos. (2004) Exploratory analysis of the effect of hail suppression operations on precipitation in Alberta. Atmospheric Research 71:1-2, 35-50. Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004. CrossRef Yan Yin, Zev Levin, Tamir G. Reisin, Shalva Tzivion. (2010) On the Response of Radar-Derived Properties to Hygroscopic Flare Seeding. Journal of Applied Meteorology 40:9, 1654-1661. Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001. Abstract . Full Text . PDF (141 KB) D.E Terblanche, G.G.S Pegram, M.P Mittermaier. (2001) The development of weather radar as a research and operational tool for hydrology in South Africa. Journal of Hydrology 241:1-2, 3-25. Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001. CrossRef E.K. Bigg. (1997) An independent evaluation of a South African hygroscopic cloud seeding experiment, 1991–1995. Atmospheric Research 43:2, 111-127. Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997. CrossRef" http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0450%281996%29035<1465%3AATPFRA>2.0.CO%3B2 http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0450%281996%29035%3C1465%3AATPFRA%3E2.0.CO%3B2
