Register Log In

Home Page Forums General Information Area Chemtrails General Discussion The two sides of the debate

October
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30	31

Who's Online Now

1 members (Russ Tanner), 9,171 guests, and 100 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

Support Our Forum

Popular Topics(Views)

311,245 High-Bypass Turbofans DO NOT Produce Contrails. So What Are Those Lines in the Sky?

292,571 VIDEO The ALUMINIZATION of Our Soils! Understanding One of the Reasons for Chemtrails

282,669 U.N. urged to freeze climate geo-engineering projects

206,753 My Chemtrail Story

191,059 U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on "Civilian Population"

153,614 John Holdren, Scientific Advisor to the President of the United States

148,297 (video) An Honest Pilot Confesses Chemtrails "A Necessary Evil"

131,424 (video) Global Skywatch Exposes the Contrail Myth

120,858 Jet Turbofan Engine Fuel Flow Rates are Much Too Low To Create Condensation Trails

99,726 CHEMTRAILS CRIME WATCH - LIVE TRACKING TOOL HERE

Credits & Thanks!

Print Thread

Rate Thread

The two sides of the debate

#3633 01/28/11 06:21 AM

Joined: Oct 2010

Posts: 116

E

Offline

Graduate Member

The two sides of the only debate that matters are these:

Rosalind Peterson
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=3475#Post3475

Commonwealth Club
http://fora.tv/2010/02/23/Geoengineering_Global_Salvation_or_Ruin

Where does "climate change scepticism" fit into this confrontation????

It is irrelevant!

Hop To

Link Copied to Clipboard

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1