|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (Russ Tanner),
8,858
guests, and
97
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1
Freshman Member
|
Greetings, I'm new, but nevertheless, am going to jump right in. I just read in a scientific journal that while a scientist, whose name I don't recall, sorry, used a computer to simulate putting sulfates in the atmosphere to stop global warming, and found it imperfect. Another scientist said oh well, can't please everyone, maybe it was a problem she only tried one kind of program to model, nothing about health effects, and her model found exactly what we are experiencing; some regions too wet, some too dry, some too hot, etc. But generally all over too dry. Here's the link, thought it would be worthwhile to comment http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100718/full/news.2010.357.htmlThanks, jaydayrock
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 13,370
Founder Master Elite Member
|
Great article for exposing the reality of geoengineering. I just posted it on my Facebook page.
Please keep the posts coming. We have lots of traffic but really need to have more people involved in spreading information.
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
