Chemtrails & Geoengineering Information & Activism.

October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (Russ Tanner), 5,146 guests, and 90 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
ShoutChat
Support Our Forum
Popular Topics(Views)
Credits & Thanks!
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutgers_University
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Robock

Publications by Alan Robock on geoengineering
http://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/robock/robock_geopapers.html

Konzept gegen Erderwärmung: US-Luftwaffe soll das Sonnenlicht dimmen (Concept against warming of the earth: US Air Force ought to dimm the sunlight)
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/...oll-das-sonnenlicht-dimmen-a-597141.html
http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=8215#Post8215


Spiegel-Online reported on December 12th 2008:
"Die Tankflugzeug KC-135 könnten pro Flug jeweils 91 Tonnen transportieren. Wenn 15 der 481 Tankflugzeuge, die die Air Force hat, an 250 Tagen pro Jahr dreimal starten würden, wäre die Arbeit vollbracht, so die Berechnungen des Forschers. Von den noch leistungsstärkeren Tankflugzeugen KC-10 Extender, von denen die US Luftwaffe 59 Exemplare besäße, benötigte man sogar nur 9 Flugzeuge, so der Forscher." http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/...oll-das-sonnenlicht-dimmen-a-597141.html
"The air tankers KC-135 could carry 91 tons for each flight. If 15 of the 481 tankers, the Air Force owns, are flying three times on 250 days a year, the task would be fulfilled, according to the calculation of the researcher. Of the even more powerful tanker of the type KC-10 Extender, which the US Air Force is owner of 59 specimens, you just need only 9 airplanes, says the researcher." (Translation by Denglisch)
http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/...oll-das-sonnenlicht-dimmen-a-597141.html

The calculation of Alan Robock in the German weekly newspaper of "DIE ZEIT" - the online version - from March 12th 2012:

"Wrong plus Wrong does not equal Right"
http://www.zeit.de/2012/12/U-Interview-Robock

As everyone with little math knowledge knows: To get it right you need multiplication.
Wrong times wrong equals right.
To return the result from right - if it is not really right! - again to wrong you need to extract the root from right.
That will be an extremely difficult thing once you started geoengineering. The results of multiplication are easily getting huge if the "wrong" inputs of this variable is rising. Anyways: as we see it the sunlight dimming already geoengineering is already underways.

"Prof. Alan Robock: 20 Gründe, warum Geo-Engineering keine gute Idee ist"
Professor Alan Robock: Twenty reasons why Geo-Engineering is no good idea
http://www.sauberer-himmel.de/2013/...rum-geo-engineering-keine-gute-idee-ist/

In the following article you may read his reasoning:

Attachments
Attached PDF document
20Reasons.pdf (988 KB, 427 downloads)
Attached PDF document
robock-cv.pdf (299.37 KB, 1332 downloads)
Last edited by Denglisch; 12/19/13 08:31 AM.
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,874
D
Master Elite Member


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.1